Skip ads and navigation
Advertising
Our network sites seattlepi.comHelp
Print thisE-mail this
Ready, set develop: How to create a six hour startup

Earlier this month, Brian Dorsey set out on a mission: develop and launch an Internet service in less than six hours.

The 33-year-old Seattle software developer wasn't looking to set a Guinness World Record. He just wanted to explore whether something worthwhile could be built on the Web in a short period of time.

Picture
Brian Dorsey

Dorsey -- who enlisted the help of about a dozen acquaintances from entrepreneurial groups in town -- nearly made his target. About seven hours after the group gathered in the living room of his Phinney Ridge home on the morning of October 6, Tagmindr -- an online bookmark reminder service -- was born.

Call it a startup on speed.

Dorsey's project, part of an effort by a group of entrepreneurs and developers known as Seattle Saturday House, might be an extreme case. But it speaks to a larger trend. The cost and time it takes to build new Internet applications is shrinking rapidly -- changing the dynamics of the technology industry which for years has been plagued by slow development times and countless hours of product testing.

These new projects (it is a little hard to call them full-fledged companies) take an entirely different approach from the software and Internet companies of the late 1990s. The new ethos among entrepreneurs: throw something out there quickly and see if it sticks.

Getting an Internet service off the ground has never been so easy, with open source software and low-cost Web site hosting available at the click of a mouse. Advice, support and -- in some cases development talent -- can be easily obtained through blogs or online groups. And new online platforms, such as Facebook and MySpace, provide fertile ground where entrepreneurs can immediately test the value of their services.

Of course, turning these small Web applications into meaningful businesses is an entirely different matter. And it is unclear whether any of them will ever make money. But this new breed of entrepreneurs -- armed with little more than an idea and some coding skills -- are quickly trying to create new features that enhance online photo, music or storage services.

It didn't take much to get Tagmindr up and running. Just an initial idea -- which Dorsey came up with earlier in the month and couldn't get out of his head -- a domain name, and a few smart people. All told, about $30 was invested in the project, including the snacks that Dorsey purchased to fuel developers during the coding marathon.

In creating an online application in an afternoon, Dorsey said he simply wanted to get more practice in product development and programming.

"It was kind of the idea of fail early and fail often," said Dorsey, who was astonished that 12 people devoted a Saturday to his project. "Ironically, I think the Tagmindr one was amazingly successful."

And Tagmindr isn't the only quick start startup to launch in recent weeks.

Mark Maunder recently created Feedjit.com -- an online application that allows bloggers to track the geographical location of users -- in less than half a day. Powered by one "finely ground" cup of coffee, the Seattle developer worked from 4 p.m. to 2:30 a.m., noting in a blog post that it took him 10.5 hours from the "first time my hand touched the keyboard until I fixed the last bug."

After spending three months creating LineBuzz and eight months on GeoJoey, Maunder said he just wanted to have some fun with Feedjit. So he set a 12 hour time limit on the project.

"You can get obsessed with picking just the right colors or layouts. I didn't worry about that," said Maunder. "I said: 'this is just going to be functional' and I got it out the door."

That's also what has driven Ben Curtis, a freelance software developer who spent a portion of his time earlier this year on an online job applicant tracking service called Catch the Best. The 31-year-old sunk about 125 hours and less than $5,000 into the project, setting a launch deadline for the end of September.

"I am a developer so, by nature, I want to add the gold-plated features and continue and continue and continue," he said. "(A deadline) pushes you to get something done and get some feedback on it."

Both Curtis and Maunder worked alone, a strategy some believe is the best approach for these quick efforts.

"I think the bigger the team gets, the more challenging it is to execute quickly," said Maunder. "I've been in so many companies where things just seem to move so incredibly slowly. I generally move quicker on my own or with really small teams."

Dorsey agreed that a larger team could derail a project, saying that Tagmindr probably could have been created by one very focused person in six hours. Multiple contributors also open up potential problems in terms of ownership of the idea.

"Being a developer, that was the thing I had thought the least about upfront. And, in that respect, I have already learned a lot from this project," said Dorsey, adding that Tagmindr's code was released with a liberal open source license.

That wasn't a problem for Maunder, who is now trying to keep up with demand.

More than 5,000 bloggers in over 100 countries have adopted the Feedjit service, an adoption rate that surpasses that of Maunder's previous three startups which he spent months building. Feedjit is also attracting more than 11,500 page views a day.

"It is weird thing because the faster I execute and the faster I get it to market, the more successful it seems to be," he said.

Now, Maunder is tinkering with ideas of how to build a business model around Feedjit. He wants to expand the concept to provide more real time statistical information to bloggers.

"I didn't set out with the idea that it is going to be a long-term thing," he said. "It was just a one or two day experiment, but it gained a heck of a lot of traction and it has gone viral."

In its second month, Maunder is already dealing with the "geometric" growth of the service. He built the site using all open source technologies -- from the programming language to the Web server to the database engine.

"You don't need to raise $1 million so that you can buy Oracle or buy a license for three Windows Web servers," said Maunder. "The only thing you pay for now is for your hardware and your bandwidth." He estimates that it took $690 to build Feedjit, including $10 for the domain name.

And what was the big lesson that Maunder learned during his 10.5 hour development push?

"Get your product, your idea, your service to market as quickly as possible and get feedback from customers," he said. "If you work in a vacuum for six months or a year without getting that feedback, you tend to ... forget about the customer."

Curtis -- who sold an online conference application last year for a slight profit -- added that he's learned the importance of developing products that matter to people.

"The big trick is not to build something," he says. "But to build something that people will actually pay you for."

Posted by at October 18, 2007 4:37 p.m.
Category:
Comments
#58931

Posted by unregistered user at 10/18/07 5:02 p.m.

Holy cow...when will these startups learn?! tagmindr...maybe a great service/product but the name is certainly a dumb one. All you are doing is driving traffic to tagminder.com. If I were you, get some money and send an email to tagminder.com and see if they will sell the domain to you. Looks like tagminder.com is still not developed yet.

#58936

Posted by Tony Wright at 10/18/07 5:21 p.m.

@unregistered - Totally depends on your market. Look no farther than Flickr, Digg.com, Reddit.com, Google.com (a mispelling of Googol), or Del.icio.us for exceptions to your rule.

Taking the "test your idea on the market before you invest too much into it" theory, it doesn't make sense to drop $10k on a domain before you know you're onto something. If you make something people want, they'll find you.

That being said, it's interesting to note that Yahoo bought delicious.com (which now redirects to del.icio.us).

#58967

Posted by briandorsey at 10/18/07 8:56 p.m.

Great article John! We live in interesting times!

@unregistered: The tagmindr name is a bit of a joke... if you're going to build a web 2.0 app as an afternoon experiment it has to have drop shadows, rounded corners, bright colors... and of course a misspelled name, right? ;)

One correction: The Tagmindr project was just one project at Saturday House, building web apps isn't the focus of the group. We meet every week and do different things - it all depends what the people who come want to do. This was the original inspiration for the group: lion.taoriver.net/?p=83

#58980

Posted by unregistered user at 10/18/07 9:43 p.m.

If it's really a joke, then what does that tell about you (its creator/founder), your service/product, and what does it say about John Cook covering a joke on this blog.

#58981

Posted by briandorsey at 10/18/07 9:51 p.m.

@unregistered: The name is a bit silly. The trend is very real.

#59035

Posted by unregistered user at 10/19/07 8:42 a.m.

what trend is that?...startups with dumb names!

#59062

Posted by briandorsey at 10/19/07 10:29 a.m.

One more addition: While I did say that I think the tagmindr idea could have been implemented in a day by one person, I know it would have been a very different, much worse result. We had a very diverse group of people come and everyone added their skills to the project. We had backend devs, front end experts, usability and design people, as well as business / marketing folks. The total combination is what made it work. In this case, the diversity that a larger group brings was a huge asset rather than a liability.

#59064

Posted by notahater at 10/19/07 10:33 a.m.

Just goes to show you how insane it is to blindly invest money in Internet startups with zero track records. Gives the phrase "dime a dozen" a whole new meanings. I'll stick with publicly traded companies thanks.

#59078

Posted by unregistered user at 10/19/07 11:18 a.m.

i think its pretty cool. there are a lot of free widgets and apps out there on the net. but as anyone knows, its a long way to the top if you want to be a roller. creating a business with real revenues is not something that can be done in a day.

#59080

Posted by unregistered user at 10/19/07 11:21 a.m.

Umm, "not a hater" ..?

The whole point here is that **investment funding is not necessary.** You can just get your buddies together, and make something that people like.

#59108

Posted by LDB at 10/19/07 1:16 p.m.

Sounds like a blast. I can't tell you the dozens of sites and ideas I've developed on my own that just don't get anywhere because they lack the contribution by someone with another facet of knowledge to contribute.. marketing.. UI design.. and the setting of a short timeline keeps your attention tuned in and focused before you get tired of the project and lose interest. Sounds like a fun way to spend a weekend.

#59224

Posted by unregistered user at 10/19/07 11:08 p.m.

There is far too much negativity in the tech community here and it needs to end today. Maybe the true techies will remember the underlying, founding principles of the internet. An open, unbiased platform for exchange of ideas and theories. An open forum for people to express themselves without ridicule. Commercialization and monetization of the net came later.

It used to be a community based on logic, science, math, and true support. I just hate to see such ugliness and hatred among kindred spirits. If you are a true techie, you will support each other, rather than tear each other down.

#91152

Posted by unregistered user at 1/28/08 9:59 a.m.

Great inspiring story! Some time back I had blogged that it shouldn't take too much to create a web based startup. In that same post I had also mentioned that the web provides "instant feedback" because customers can start using your service and start providing feedback right away. (I am from the telecom background where we "waste" a couple of 100-million $$ dancing on tables and otherwise doing absolutely nothing - engineering wise - before we see the first buck from the customer.)

Anyway, this story is inspiring me to learn web technologies and try my hand at some idea.

Thanks again for the inspiration.

#128038

Posted by unregistered user at 5/12/08 7:00 p.m.

I agree with getting rid of the negativity. It makes me wonder why he felt the necessity to negatively jump on this awesome display of innovation, creativity, and ingenuity. Kudos to all of you.

! Login below to post a comment.

Registered users, log in here
E-mail 
Password 
Remember me
 HELP! I forget my password

Unregistered users, sign up now

Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Your comment (No HTML allowed, use these special codes instead)
Violating our Terms of Service may result in your post being removed.

Special codes
  • [b]selected text[/b] -- Display the selected text in bold.
  • [i]selected text[/i] -- Display the selected text in italics.
  • [link]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags.
  • [link title="Seattle Post-Intelligencer"]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags, uses title as link text.
  • [mail]newmedia@seattlepi.com[/mail] -- Creates a link to an email address.
Enter the code shown:
What is this?
BLOGGER BIO
photo
John Cook: P-I venture capital reporter
SEATTLE TECH EVENTS

Click here for a listing of conferences, events and social gatherings in Seattle's high-tech industry. To submit an event for consideration on the calendar, e-mail me here.

FEATURED COMMENT

PictureForget the ad space altogether. It's time that Microsoft to show the long term vision that created their success in the first place. Clearly there are far more valuable, provocative and lucrative problems for technology to solve than consumer spending and entertainment. It's time for the Blue Monster to think bigger thoughts."

-- Reader on Yahoo deal is over, so what startups will Microsoft buy?.

ARCHIVES
May 2008
SMTWTFS
        123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Browse by month
Browse by category

Recent entries
· A new Yahoo board: Icahn, Cuban, Chapple?
· Fundraising: "An exercise in getting rejected"
· CEO gone, VC cash in -- time to cut staff
· Report: Kindle sales at $750 million in 2010?
· Roundup: inCampus, Bothell devices, Strands
· Amazon takes stake in Animoto
· "You Tube of Radiology" sold to McKesson
· Dinosaurs, nuclear power and Nathan Myhrvold

Search this blog

Older archives

RSS/Web feeds (help)
RSS 2.0RSS 1.0Atom
Headlines for your site

LINKS

Blogs
· Business 2.0
· Business Week
· Don Dodge
· Feld Thoughts
· Paul Kedrosky's Infectious Greed
· John Ludwig
· Om Malik
· Market Velocity
· MocoNews.net
· Rain City Real Estate
· Seattle 2.0
· Steve Hall
· Silicon Valley Watcher
· Martin Tobias
· VentureBeat
· VentureBlog
· Venture Chronicles
· Who Has Time for This?
· Xconomy

Publications
· CNet News.com
· Private Equity Week
· Red Herring
· Corante

Organizations
· NW Entrepreneur Network
· Nat'l VC Assn.
· WSA
· Seraph Capital Forum
· Technology Alliance

Other VC links
· Topix.net VC News
· PWC MoneyTree Survey
· VentureOne

Seattle startup bloggers
· Avvo
· Marcelo Calbucci of Sampa
· Cleverset blog
· Mike Davidson of Newsvine
· Farecast blog
· Jobster blog
· Greg Linden
· LiquidPlanner
· Kevin Merritt of Blist
· Mpire
· Robert Pease of MessageGate
· Pluggd blog
· Redfin blog
· RescueTime
· Andy Sack
· Kelly Smith of Curious Office Partners
· David Xue of PixPulse
· Zillow blog
· WhitePages.com

IN THE MONEY
CompanyAmount raised
Week of May 12
  Talyst$20 mil.
Week of April 28
  Jobster$7 mil.
  ReliOn$23 mil.
  Verdiem$12 mil.
  Wishpot$1 mil.
*Previous weeks
ADVERTISING
LAYOFF TRACKER
 Company# of layoffs
Talyst11
Lumera29
Sonus16
Lockdown32 (closed)
Merck12
 *Complete list
FIRMS

Pacific Northwest venture capital and equity firms

PACIFIC NORTHWEST IPOs
Applied Precision (Canceled)
Classmates (Canceled)
Clearwire (Priced March 7 2007)
First Financial Northwest (Priced Oct. 2007)
Imperium Renewables (Up to $345 million)(Delayed)
Intelius ($143 million filed Jan. 2008)
Light Sciences Oncology (Canceled)
Omeros ($115 million filed Jan. 2008)
Symetra (Up to $750 million) (Delayed)
Tully''s Coffee (Up to $50 million)(Delayed)
Venture Financial (Up to $46 million) (Delayed)
Varolii (Up to $86 million)
Advertising

Seattle Post-Intelligencer
101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000

Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.

Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Hearst Newspapers