Advertising
seattlepi.com
NWclassifieds | NWsource | Subscribe | Contact Us | Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Jump to:  Weather | Traffic | Webtowns | Mariners | Seahawks | Sonics | Forums
A&E ?

OUR AFFILIATES
NWsource
KOMO
MSNBC
TV GAL IN L.A.
Melanie McFarland blogs from the networks' midsummer press tour.

July 24, 2005

Salting the peacock's tail

We have a week to go, and we're pretty much finished being polite. Around here that means talking smack about a series or a network within earshot of executives, producers, even the sensitive talent, and not caring how they feel about it.

In other words, NBC arrived just in the nick of time.

NBC had a rough year. The network lost close to a billion dollars at the upfronts in May; canceled every new show it premiered in 2004-2005 except for "Medium" and "Joey," the second of which should be dead; and finished the season in fourth place.

Such news made the evil jackals within us begin salivating. Every press tour, you see, NBC Universal executives Jeff Zucker and Kevin Reilly make a grand entrance, strutting around the stage while talking about the old rules no longer applying and lying through their teeth about how tremendous their schedule is.

This wild arrogance even continued through last year, when the network was stinking worse than Kevin Federline's feet. That, my friends, is plain delusional behavior. If Tom Cruise were a network, he would be NBC.

Reilly
Reilly

Thus it was something of a shock to see Reilly, NBC's president of entertainment, humbly walk onstage alone on Sunday morning. Then he admitted to his network's failures.

To continue the TomKat metaphor, he appeared to be where I imagine Katie Holmes will be, emotionally speaking, in about five years. That is, repentant and full of regret at having force-fed her lapse of reason to the public.

"Really, last season for us was kind of a colonic. It wasn't a lot of fun to go through at the time, but it's going to be healthy in the long run," Reilly said. "It really took any residual sense of entitlement or complacency at our company and blew it out, so to speak."

Having planted that delightful image in our heads minutes after many of us had consumed bran muffins and coffee, he tiptoed through the Peacock's plans.

NBC's season officially starts Sept. 19. The final season of "Will & Grace" kicks off Sept. 29 with a live episode directed by James Burrows, guest starring Alec Baldwin and Eric Stoltz. Two versions will be shot, one for each coast, with different jokes for each broadcast.

The network also has projects in development with Paul Haggis ("Million Dollar Baby," "Crash") and Frank Darabont ("The Shawshank Redemption"). Reilly then announced NBC's pick-up of two more dramas: "Windfall," about a group of friends who win a $386 million lottery jackpot, and "Book of Daniel," starring Aidan Quinn. A reality series called "Treasure Hunter" also is in the works.

Finally, Reilly exhibited cautious optimism regarding "My Name is Earl," which debuts at 9 p.m. Sept. 20, and will be paired in the hour with another season of "The Office."

Apparently "Earl" was the highest-testing comedy in 15 years -- meaning, a group of strangers who watched it in a dark room somewhere liked it more than lots of other junk, including "Friends."

Again, Reilly didn't admit that until someone asked him about it, and he refused to see too much into "Earl's" test score. "Medical Investigation" probably tested well, too. Look at where that got him.

He didn't mention other comedies NBC is holding back for midseason, including "Four Kings" and "Thick and Thin," neither of which is worth getting excited about.

In fact, Reilly didn't give us many direct answers to our questions. The only "scoop" we found out about "The West Wing," for instance, is that it has a 22-episode commitment, and that it will run straight through except for a few interruptions. No news about when the Bartlet administration might make its exit or anything along those lines. He didn't even have Martha Stewart's "Apprentice" catchphrase to share.

This bored us. Boredom leads to surliness. And a surly critic is a rude critic.

"Why is it so hard right now for NBC to make a good comedy?" somebody asked. "... Are we really to believe that 'Thick and Thin' is one of the three best comedies you had this year? And if so, what's the problem?"

Reilly did a softshoe around the question before fielding the next one.

"Kevin, I don't think I've ever seen NBC seem as 'I'm humbled' as you were when you came out to talk to us. I think in January you were still kind of in denial," another obviously emboldened soul asked. "When did this set in, this realization? And seriously, how tough is it to concede these points and say, 'Hey, we may not have hit bottom yet and we're in trouble?'"

Ouch!

"Well, it's human nature. There was denial. There was denial. That's human nature," Reilly said with a nervous smile. "... At this point in time, just the fact is the fact ... we had enormous, history-making hits going away. We needed to re-seed them. It didn't happen, and now we are where we are. I can tell you, it's like a weird monkey off my back, in a way."

There was more. "Do you personally feel under the gun?" "Thursday night, aren't you just wasting a season here? You've got all shows down-trending."

I almost felt sorry for the man.

But then, what does Reilly expect? Zucker was in Reilly's position from 2000 until last year -- he was named president of NBC Universal's Television Group upon Reilly's arrival -- and did not bring a single bona fide hit to the network during his tenure. Zucker set NBC up for the downhill slide Reilly has inherited. We shouldn't be surprised the new entertainment president hasn't yet found a way to stop its skid.

The surest thing NBC has in the works is -- what else? -- another Dick Wolf project. It won't be under the "Law & Order" umbrella, especially since "Trial By Jury" didn't perform as expected. Wolf was quite ticked off at the fourth "Law & Order's" cancellation, Reilly added. So to ease his annoyance, NBC is putting the producer's new show on the development fast track.

"We have a tremendous amount of business we're going to do with Dick," the executive said.

Look at that statement in another way, and it pretty much sums up the state of things at NBC, too.

Posted by Melanie McFarland at July 24, 2005 11:18 PM
Comments

I suppose it's a telling commentary on the state of "network" television, but the only series I watch anymore (and for the past three years minimum) are a few shows on Showtime and HBO. The "networks," ha! They've become that which Newton Minnow accused them of half-a-lifetime ago - "a vast wasteland."

Posted by: Chas Redmond at July 25, 2005 01:33 AM

NBC should team up with their parent company and do a series about buying influence at the White House that expedites the sale of their GE nuclear reactors to the Chinese ... that would be as funny as anything else those coke-addled losers stuff through their "entertainment pipeline..."

Posted by: Bill williams at July 25, 2005 06:07 AM

This is the stupidest article describing television. Of course network TV sucks. What's the debate about? If only they would allow profanity, nudity, or something mildly entertaining without censoring their creative talent, maybe they could find a decent writer. But since they refuse to allow anything mildly controversial, they continue to fail. That's why we have to watch Comedy Central for anything entertaining, or HBO for truly censor free programming (and even there they censor out nudity to a degree...)

Posted by: Ben Johnson at July 25, 2005 08:00 AM

You're exactly right Ben, let's watch people do it on air and run around with their units hanging out, that would save TV. Dude just get over your embarassment and rent porn if that's what you want. It's not censorship to hold television to some form of decency standard.

Posted by: Jeff at July 25, 2005 09:01 AM

They should hand over the TV network to the Japanese. :)

Posted by: Elaine Supkis at July 25, 2005 09:07 AM

who the hell watches TV ?

Posted by: zorro at July 25, 2005 09:14 AM

What happened to Scrubs? It's the best comedy NBC has in years yet it's not even slated for the new season.

Posted by: Kelly Mears at July 25, 2005 09:23 AM

OK; I'll admit it, that last sentence was an "Instant Classic".
Maybe the "Salting the Peacock's Tail" author should take pity on NBC, and write a few episodes of any of their comedy line-up.
Lord knows they could use the help.

Posted by: Ken R. at July 25, 2005 09:35 AM

Once "Serenity" hits theaters this fall, I've heard that Joss Whedon is going to be shopping Firefly around for a new home. FOX shafted him pretty badly; if NBC can keep their censors off his back (realizing that making the news for being risque is a GOOD thing) and air his shows in order (there's numbers right on the film cans, guys) then they could buy a big-budget hit with an audience already attached.

Posted by: Jim R. at July 25, 2005 10:47 AM

Debating network TV? That's good. Maybe some of you pathetic people should get out more. Better yet, why not take a stab at reading.

Posted by: chris at July 25, 2005 11:09 AM

I feel your pain, Ben but it's not about allowing nudity on TV. The restrictions go deeper than that. If nudity were allowed, these execs would have boobies and butts on every day of the week.
That would be as vapid as the current sanitized junk.
No, it's about allowing some of the great talent that's out there do their craft. The networks are run by some of the most cowardly, ineffective knuckleheads to walk the planet. People will flock to the first network that says to hell with being safe.
Not all of it will please everyone. It fact. there will be cries of moral turpitude from the usual cast of 'More Holy Than You.' But it would revitalize TV, allow us to see 'real' entertainment, real theatre!
The smaller cable networks are already experimenting with low-cost self-made movies, this is a good trend. We just have to allow them the room to make good stuff, the room to entertain us.
There is too much for Americans to do other than watch TV. The networks are in denial about their audience. They don't have the numbers any more. When you show nothing but crap on your station, your audience will reflect it.
Sooner than later, we will be able to program our own nightly schedule, pick and choose what to watch. Those who create quality will have the audience, those than produce junk will hear nothing but crickets.

Posted by: David Aquarius at July 25, 2005 11:11 AM

So what does that make you Chris, for jumping into the fray?

Posted by: Jeff at July 25, 2005 11:13 AM

American Dreams was the Best Show on NBC and they Cancel it. Coupling the Best Show on BBC gets fouled up in the adaptation to US TV. Their big hope "Joey" sucks. Will and Grace jumped the shark years ago with their Cameo of the week concept. NBC needs a major shake-up!

Posted by: Randy at July 25, 2005 11:49 AM

Every one of the big three has been in and out of the doldrums. Last year it was ABC. NBC will spread it's feathers in a season or 2.

Posted by: Mike B. at July 25, 2005 12:24 PM

Every one of the big three has been in and out of the doldrums. Last year it was ABC. NBC will spread it's feathers in a season or 2.

Posted by: Mike B. at July 25, 2005 12:24 PM

Every one of the big three has been in and out of the doldrums. Last year it was ABC. NBC will spread it's feathers in a season or 2.

Posted by: Mike B. at July 25, 2005 12:24 PM

NBC is looking at the logical outcome of their six sigma effort.

Everything is driven by cost, and when you are only concerned with cost, you lose quality.

Imagine if Seinfeld was coming on today.

The first few episodes of Seinfeld were so stiff and bland that today the show would be canceled before it had time to mature.

Posted by: jfw at July 25, 2005 02:21 PM

The NBC peacock is going the way of the Dodo or passenger pigeon - extinct. The only way to survive is through quality - use HBO as the model.

Posted by: Mitch at July 25, 2005 02:23 PM

It's not just prime time.......The Today show has lost its wide appeal and the "personalities" in that time slot need to go!

Posted by: KLYNN R at July 25, 2005 02:24 PM

'Scrubs' will be back mid-season when one of their other comedies fails (either new or old... old being 'Joey' or 'The Office'). 'Scrubs' is where it should be-- a series like WKRP or 'NewsRadio' that's meant to have a short life. If they had scheduled it for September, they probably would have had last year's soft numbers. At least this way, it can go out w/ a quasi-bang than whimper.

Posted by: Quentin McCaw at July 25, 2005 08:44 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?







  ARCHIVES
November 2005
S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Monthly archive
· July 2005

What is this?

 
Home | Site Map | About the P-I | Contact Us | P-I Jobs | Home Delivery
 
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000

Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820

Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
©1996-2005 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Service/Privacy Policy