Skip ads and navigation
Advertising
Our network sites seattlepi.comHelp
The Big Blog
Print thisE-mail this
Monica Guzman
Bikes vs. cars: Things to keep in mind from Seattle bike law attorney Bob Anderton

Maybe it's unavoidable. Maybe bikes and cars might never get along.

Drivers, after all, can't avoid the gas pump or slink around stopped traffic with the wind at their back and a smile on their face. And bicyclists don't have the luxury of riding in a climate-controlled environment and making only a few gliding moves -- hand wave here, a pedal push there -- to tra-la-la around the city.

Picture
Bob Anderton, a Seattle-based lawyer who represents injured cyclists, rides through traffic in downtown Seattle near his law office Wednesday, Aug. 8, 2007. (AP photo)

But maybe -- just maybe -- there's hope. As reaction to today's story (and every other story) on the never-ending tension between bikers and drivers suggests (see our Sound Off plus this plea from a Seattlest cyclist/driver and this post from Slog), some of the bike-car rage could come from good old fashioned misunderstanding. The beauty of that? It can be fixed.

So OK. What is it that we're not getting?

Well, ideally, it would be nice if all involved to give the state's bicycle laws a close, careful read. But since that's not going to happen, we asked Bob Anderton, a Seattle bicyclist and one of a growing number of attorneys who specialize in bike-related cases around the country, to cut to the good stuff.

  • It's OK for bicycles to be in the middle of the street, despite what the driver of that SUV that almost hit a Fremont bicyclist seems to think. However... "There is a law that you're supposed to ride as far to the right as is safe," Anderton said (UPDATE: upon reading the first comment on this post, I checked back with Anderton. I had misheard the quote. Also -- that law applies only when the bicyclist is riding more slowly than vehicle traffic).

  • Bicyclists can, indeed, ride on the sidewalk. "At least multiple times a month I have people tell me that I shouldn't be riding my bike on the sidewalk, 'cause it's not allowed. But it is allowed. They're just wrong," Anderton said.

  • It's OK for bikes to pass cars on the road, "so long as there's room on the road for two vehicles and one of those vehicles is a bike," Anderton said.

  • Cars must yield to bikes in designated bike lanes, which means, first of all, that cars notice bike lanes. Anderton interrupted the interview to describe what he saw as he looked out his window onto 2nd Avenue: "I just saw a person riding in the marked bicycle lane, then an SUV turn left in front of the person and making guy slam on his brakes so as not to be hit by the SUV. I can do this every day," he said.

  • Bikes can only ride up to two abreast. More than that, as is currently seen in the monthly Critical Mass event, is illegal. "It might be fun to block traffic," Anderton said, "but it's even more fun to pass traffic."

Anderton's bike-related caseload has grown so much he recently hired an associate, he said. Most of the injury claims that land on his desk involve cyclists being hit when cars make right turns on red lights, at the intersections of roads and bike trails, and by running into just-opened car doors.

The most common accident he's come across in which the bicyclist is at fault? Collisions after riders run stop signs and red lights.

Yes, there are some crazy bicyclists out there. But Anderton offered this thought: Better a crazy bicyclist than a crazy driver. "The difference between a crazy person on a bike and a crazy person behind the wheel of an SUV is that the bicyclist is going to get hurt, and the SUV driver is going to hurt other people," Anderton said. "Do you want those crazy bicyclists driving SUVs? No. Let them ride."

Anderton has been hit many times on his bike, though he's never been hurt. He also admits to having been tempted on more than one occasion to give testy drivers a piece of his mind. But to fellow cyclists, Anderton recommends calm.

It's like his father used to say. "It doesn't matter who's wrong or right," Anderton said, "if you're underneath the Cadillac."

Posted by at November 5, 2007 4:45 p.m.
Categories: ,
Comments
#63487

Posted by Lookitsme at 11/5/07 5:17 p.m.

There is a law that you're supposed to ride as far to the right as there is space

Actually, you are supposed to ride as far to the right as is safe. Quite frequently, this is in the middle of the lane on a multi-lane road. It's almost always the case going down a hill.

#63489

Posted by jungleal at 11/5/07 5:19 p.m.

Time out for clarification. Why is car driver at fault for opening driver door and then biker hitting the driver and/or door? And what about driver turning right on green light and having biker slide under the car's right side? How can that be the car driver's fault? The damn bikers are flaunting so many traffic rules. Please cite state statutes for these cases.

#63495

Posted by slugbiker at 11/5/07 5:28 p.m.

The reason the driver who opens his door is at fault is because the traffic in the roadway (and that includes bicyclists) have the right of way over someone exiting a vehicle. It's the stopped driver's responsibility to NOT open a car door until it is safe to do so.

text of law below:

RCW 46.61.620
Opening and closing vehicle doors.

No person shall open the door of a motor vehicle on the side adjacent to moving traffic unless and until it is reasonably safe to do so, and can be done without interfering with the movement of other traffic, nor shall any person leave a door open on the side of a vehicle adjacent to moving traffic for a period of time longer than necessary to load or unload passengers.

#63498

Posted by Monica Guzman at 11/5/07 5:35 p.m.

Lookitsme -- Upon reading your comment, I called Anderton again. Turns out I misheard his quote, and the law does say "as is safe." Thanks!

#63502

Posted by Lookitsme at 11/5/07 6:13 p.m.

How can it be a driver's fault for cutting off a biker at a green light?

Well, the most obvious answer I can think of is this - driver passes bicyclist near turn and hooks right in front of said cyclist effectively cutting him/her off.

This is one of the many reasons why experienced cyclists will not hug the road's edge.

Next question?

#63514

Posted by unregistered user at 11/5/07 7:10 p.m.

Followed a cyclist up Eastlake a few weeks back - hanging respectfully back in my car - in the pouring rain. I struggled to pass her when it was safe - she refused to give an INCH to make it safer for me to pass or even acknowlege that she shared the road with (gasp!) a horseless carriage. However, I was astounded that this person ran EVERY RED LIGHT between S. Lake Union and the University bridge.

(Had she stopped at the red lights, I would have easily gotten around her and no body would have been "on her tail.")

Aren't the red lights for cyclists too - or have they evolved beyond that now?

Please advise - as I was having fantasies about Professor Fate's black car in the movie "The Great Race" that had a front mounted cannon that proved fateful indeed for a famous Paris landmark - let alone a self-righteous Seattle cyclist.

#63535

Posted by unregistered user at 11/5/07 9:21 p.m.

Although bikes can pass on the right in Seattle, it's not a bright move in the situations I've mostly seen it applied - coasting to the head of the queue at a red light - several drivers likely worked their way past you, and it's not gaining you much time to pass them again, only to force them to work their way around you again. Better just to wait your turn like the rest of the vehicles on the road. And to all my fellow bicyclists - your "rights" on the road are best viewed as privileges, just like your fellow road users. The best lesson I received in driver's ed was this: you never HAVE the right of way, but you often must yield it to others. It's never YOUR road, car or bike.

#63544

Posted by unregistered user at 11/5/07 9:50 p.m.

When I used to commute by bike, I generally would move into the middle of the right lane of traffic when approaching an intersection. This kept people from doing the move described above, where the turn into you. If the light turned red, I just stayed in line with the cars until I was through the intersection.

A few times drivers got very impatient about that, wanting to accelerate faster than I could. But I had to do what I thought was in the interests of safety.

The only exceptions to the "wait in line" rule for traffic lights were situations where the traffic was totally jammed up and the line was many light cycles long. In that case I would move past the cars while they were stopped, then merge in and move with them while they moved, then move past them again while they were stopped. This was legal, and there are limits beyond where politeness becomes ridiculous. It wasn't helping anyone for me to just be sitting in line because the drivers had to.

#63558

Posted by Lookitsme at 11/5/07 11:13 p.m.

I generally would move into the middle of the right lane of traffic when approaching an intersection. This kept people from doing the move described above, where the turn into you.

This is definitely the safest way to handle most intersections - riding predictably as part of the traffic flow.

For anyone who is interested in good urban cycling techniques, like the one noted above, this is an excellent resource: http://www.bikexprt.com/streetsmarts/usa/index.htm

I have been transportation cycling several thousand miles a year for more than 20 years without a collision using techniques very much in line with those described in Streetsmarts.

#63704

Posted by unregistered user at 11/6/07 1:16 p.m.

Thanks for the link Lookitsme--lot of common sense stuff,
but it seems like a lot of the newbees are lacking in common sense. As the buddhists say, "what you're doing now is what you're doing now".

#63735

Posted by unregistered user at 11/6/07 3:16 p.m.

If both drivers and bike riders had more education about the law and more skill at driving/riding things would go a lot more smoothly and safely.

Almost everything at that "streetsmarts" website boils down to one thing -- the bike rider should know when to take his place as part of the general traffic flow and when to move out of the general traffic flow. This does depend on the drivers accepting them, but I have found that usually they do, as long as the bike behaves exactly like another car would.

#64740

Posted by unregistered user at 11/9/07 8:00 a.m.

bikes are the best to avoid traffic jams. I'm planning to buy one from bikes for sale classifieds, but I dont know which one will be the best for the city ride.

! Login below to post a comment.

Registered users, log in here
E-mail 
Password 
Remember me
 HELP! I forget my password

Unregistered users, sign up now

Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Your comment (No HTML allowed, use these special codes instead)
Violating our Terms of Service may result in your post being removed.

Special codes
  • [b]selected text[/b] -- Display the selected text in bold.
  • [i]selected text[/i] -- Display the selected text in italics.
  • [link]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags.
  • [link title="Seattle Post-Intelligencer"]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags, uses title as link text.
  • [mail]newmedia@seattlepi.com[/mail] -- Creates a link to an email address.
Enter the code shown:
What is this?
TOP CONTRIBUTORS
photo
Monica Guzman: Online reporter
photo
Athima Chansanchai: P-I reporter
photo
Candace Heckman: Breaking news editor
photo
Gene Stout: Seattle PI Pop Music Critic
photo
D Parvaz: Editorial writer, columnist
JOIN IN

· Got a tip or post idea?
· Join our Facebook group
· Become a Big Blog fan

ARCHIVES
May 2008
SMTWTFS
        123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Browse by month
Browse by category
Browse by author

Recent entries
· Seattle policing: 'Would YOU sign up for this abuse?'
· Seattle is going to the Tony Awards
· Protest du Jour: McCain in town for money...
· Death Cab rolls out new album
· Does Johnny Depp want to buy the Crocodile Cafe?
· Everett man and girlfriend 'poster children for identity theft'
· 'Stop whining. It's Belltown' and other perspectives on change
· What do you do with a watermelon you bought on patrol in Baghdad?

Search this blog

RSS/Web feeds (help)
RSS 2.0RSS 1.0Atom
Headlines for your site

Add to Technorati Favorites

LINKS

Seattle City Blogs
· Citizen Rain
· Metroblogging Seattle
· Seattlest
· Capitol Hill Seattle
· West Seattle Blog
· Seattle Daily Photo
· Hillku
· Urbnlivn
· Slog

ON THE WEB

Metroblogging Seattle
· Yet Another Free Ice Cream Day
· Transportation Tales (title still a working progress)

Seattlest
· David Schmader Explains Showgirls for You
· Pesto Manifesto

Slog
· Obama and Coal
· SLOG As A Public Service

Citizen Rain
· Ballard Pool halts nude swimming sessions
· 'Newsweek International' editor speaking here

ADVERTISING

Most recent posts
· The Big Blog: Seattle policing: 'Would YOU sign up for this abuse?'
· Northwest Law: Resolving McCain's Environmental Record.
· Videoblogging 206: Podcast: Interview with Chinwe Onyekere, RWJF Games For Health

*Would you like to blog for us?

MySeattlePix
Advertising

Seattle Post-Intelligencer
101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000

Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.

Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Hearst Newspapers