Advertising
Print thisE-mail this
Seattle U theme party creates controversy

On Feb. 2 Female students living in a house at 15th Avenue and East Spruce street threw a party, in which the women in attendance dressed as animals and the men dressed as hunters.

The party has distressed students and administrators who came together for a "Courageous Conversations" open forum to discuss how the party promotes male dominance and abuse towards women. Further action may be taken against the students.

Still, some sophomore communications majors at the school are planning a second party, with the same theme.

Read the entire story in The Spectator.

As a student at Seattle U and a member of The Spectator staff, I've heard many defend the party, claiming that critics are overreacting. I disagree. To suggest that a party like this does not demean women and have a negative effect on out entire gender is ignorant.

What is most appalling is that the party was hosted by women. I would like to hear one defense from them as to how this party was positive in any sense or that it was a productive use of the time that they have the privilege of attending a university.

What do you think?

Posted by at February 19, 2008 10:14 a.m.
Category:
Comments
#99740

Posted by unregistered user at 2/19/08 10:55 a.m.

Wrong.

This party is simply an example of the natural desire women have to be pursued by a lover. Sure, it was taken to a fairly absurd extreme with the costumes and all, but to claim that it is promoting abuse is even more absurd.

So get off your femi-nazi soapbox and realize that this is part of what it means to truly be feminine. What is the true shame is that so many people think gender distinctives should be wiped out. To do this is to try to remove something natural. you might as well try to change the DNA strands in every cell of your body. Fools.

-george

#99796

Posted by shawnkempsbartender at 2/19/08 2:08 p.m.

Isn't it up to women to decide for themselves whether they are being demeaned?

#99801

Posted by AReasonableMind at 2/19/08 2:28 p.m.

Much ado about nothing, as I noted in my letter to the editor for this upcoming issue.

The fact is, people need to learn to mind their business and understand the old motto "different strokes for different folks." Who cares if someone has a theme party that is potentially oppressive? For that matter, who cares what the hell people do in private parties - sexism, racism, homophobia, xenophobia, whatever...if you don't like such a party, don't attend it. If you were one of the folks quoted in the article who thinks the hosts are ignorant, then let your moral superiority be enough to satisfy you.

Rose, you bring up "productive uses of time." But you might want to ask the bigger question: how is a "Courageous Conversation" or any of the other nonsense sparked by the outcry of less than a dozen students a productive use of Seattle University's time (and resources)? The school, being a Jesuit institution, should focus on actual social justice issues. And this is not one of them.

Plus, if one light-hearted celebration is enough to potentially unhinge the entire social standing women have achieved through the 19th and 20th centuries, then we've got bigger problems than theme parties.

#99933

Posted by unregistered user at 2/19/08 10:49 p.m.

i dont understand why females engage in acts that demean other females. united we stand, together we fall apart...

#99953

Posted by unregistered user at 2/20/08 12:22 a.m.

Here is a better question: Which is a more productive use of time for a college student - going to an awesome party or complaining about an awesome party?

I say put the fight against the phallocracy on hold and have a little fun. College students have their whole lives left to take themselves way too seriously. Have a beer. Make a memory. Who knows - you may like it.

#100053

Posted by jjallin at 2/20/08 11:14 a.m.

p-c stikes again. lighten up, their just having some fun. to all do-gooders go hug a tree and pick up some trash, feed a bum etc...

! Login below to post a comment.

Registered users, log in here
E-mail 
Password 
Remember me
 HELP! I forget my password

Unregistered users, sign up now

Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Your comment (No HTML allowed, use these special codes instead)
Violating our Terms of Service may result in your post being removed.

Special codes
  • [b]selected text[/b] -- Display the selected text in bold.
  • [i]selected text[/i] -- Display the selected text in italics.
  • [link]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags.
  • [link title="Seattle Post-Intelligencer"]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags, uses title as link text.
  • [mail]newmedia@seattlepi.com[/mail] -- Creates a link to an email address.
Enter the code shown:
What is this?
SUBSCRIBE

RSS
Headline widget

BLOGGER BIOS
photo
Jennifer Au: SPI executive producer
photo
Jesse DeLira: SPI photographer
photo
Lucas Boyle: SPI photographer
ARCHIVES
Search this blog

Recent entries
· Deerhunter's Shoes
· Socially Conscious in Seattle
· Craig + McQueen
· Unembedded
· On the Beach

Browse by month
Browse by category
Browse by author

RSS/Web feeds (help)
RSS 2.0RSS 1.0Atom
Headlines for your site

LINKS

· Three Imaginary Girls
· The Stranger
· SPI
· Make
· Craigslist
· YouveBeenSpied.com
· Viceland
· You Tube
· Google News
· Wikipedia
· IMDB

ADVERTISING
Advertising

Seattle Post-Intelligencer
101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000

Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820

Send comments to spi@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy