Skip ads and navigation
Advertising
Our network sites seattlepi.comHelp
Print thisE-mail this
EPA is praised and damned for its actions and lack of actions on how it handles pesticides.

In the chaotic and weird world of regulating agricultural chemicals, EPA gets praised for banning one pesticide and sued for not banning another, all on the same day.

This morning, a lawsuit was filed in federal court in San Francisco against the EPA to stop the continued use of a pesticide called endosulfan, which has already been banned by the European Union and 20 other countries, according to Kathryn Gilje, director of the Pesticide Action Network.

The suit, which was brought by a coalition of farm worker, public health and environmental groups demands that the EPA ban endosulfan, which is a DDT-like organochlorine. The groups charge that endosulfan is persistent in the environment and poisons humans and wildlife both in agricultural areas and in regions far from where it was applied.

"This dangerous and antiquated pesticide should have been off the market years ago," said Karl Tupper, a staff scientist with Pesticide Action Network. "The fact that EPA is still allowing the use of a chemical this harmful shows just how broken our regulatory system is."

Acute poisoning from endosulfan can cause headaches, nausea, vomiting, convulsions, and in extreme cases, unconsciousness and even death.

A 2007 study found that children exposed to endosulfan in the first trimester of pregnancy had a significantly greater risk for developing autism spectrum disorders. In addition, endosulfan has been found in food supplies, drinking water and in the tissues and breast milk of pregnant mothers, the suit states.

"Congress gave EPA the duty to protect the public from dangerous pesticides," said Joshua Osborne-Klein, a Seattle-based attorney for Earthjustice who is representing the coalition. "EPA's decision to keep endosulfan on the market despite the well-documented risks to children and wildlife is dangerous and illegal."

Mae Wu, health attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, added: "When EPA doesn't consider how a hazardous pesticide could impact the health of children, it is breaking the law. She called EPA's approach to reviewing the safety of this chemical "flawed and dangerous - but also illegal."

However, when it comes to another ag chemical, carbofuran, EPA has taken a surprisingly forceful and unusual action to protect children by revoking its license to be used.

The insecticide was initially approved by EPA to control pests in soil and on leaves in a variety of field, fruit, and vegetable crops - mostly corn, alfalfa, and potatoes - but now the agency has concluded that "that dietary, worker, and ecological risks are of concern for all uses of carbofuran. "

"All products containing carbofuran generally cause unreasonable adverse effects on humans and the environment and do not meet safety standards," the agency said in a statement. And added, "Due to considerable risks associated with carbofuran in food and drinking water, EPA is revoking the regulations that allow carbofuran residues in food. "

Even though less than a million pounds of the chemical is applied in the U.S., the USDA opposed EPA's action, saying the carbrfuran is "economically important." Nevertheless, EPA stuck to its plans.

"Because dietary exposures to infants and children are of particular concern, the Agency is moving to revoke carbofuran tolerances first, before canceling carbofuran registrations," said the EPA.

This is the first time in 20 years that the EPA has initiated regulatory action against a
registered pesticide," said agency Spokesman Dale Kemery.

When a pesticide poses risks of unreasonable adverse effects and does not meet the agency's food safety standard, EPA first tries to reach a voluntary agreement with the registrant, the manufacturer, to phase out or immediately terminate uses.

EPA had no indication that the manufacturer, FMC Corporation, would undertake a voluntary cancellation of carbofuran, explained Kemery.

"So we are moving ahead with tolerance revocation, an important step in the broader process of canceling all uses of carbofuran in the U.S." he said.

EPA establishes tolerances for pesticides that may be found on foods, and can also revoke tolerances to better safeguard public health and the environment.

"EPA is finally doing the right thing with carbofuran, after years of people demanding that it be banned," said Earthjustice's Osborne-Klein. "EPA needs to do the same thing with endosulfan. Americans don't want these poisons in our food, children, and environment."

For far more details and background, check out Jen Sass' blog at the NRDC.

Posted by at July 24, 2008 11:09 a.m.
Categories: , , , , ,
Comments
#155015

Posted by RJH at 7/24/08 2:30 p.m.

Something's going on, so far this has been a summer of very few birds and not more than a handful count of bees in the garden. I suspect it has a lot to do with the poisons we put into the envionment.

Living by a city park, I was awaken by song birds in the morning for many years. That seems to have noticably diminished over the past 2-3 years. This summer it's the sound of silence that wakes me.

RJH

#155039

Posted by Will in Seattle at 7/24/08 3:39 p.m.

I have to agree with RJH, I haven't seen nearly as many birds this summer in comparison with previous summers.

#155988

Posted by unregistered user at 7/27/08 10:51 a.m.

Bridging the gap between South and North for pesticide/ chemical regulations and research
The situation of pesticide and chemical market, advertising, transportation and distribution, labeling, worker protection and in general regulatory activities in developing countries is very bad and need immediate support from international scientific community and also from international regulatory agencies to prevent more misuse. Due to the lack of regulatory bodies and enforcement in these countries and specially lack of proper labeling and distribution and finally lack of knowledge in final consumer many cases of suicide using pesticides happens every year in each of these countries. Pesticides are sold in food stores and sometimes in open containers with no labels. Reading the labels before use rarely happens due to lack of ability for reading. In most of these developing countries there is absolutely no enforcement power (if there is a written regulations at all) and licensing procedure for agricultural worker protection and these workers do their spraying with any type of equipment that they can find with no protecting clothing.
Role of local governments and politics: Due to the unstable situations of governments in many of developing countries some very important tasks like pesticide/ chemical regulations and enforcement are ignored and in most cases they only exist on paper. In some of these countries mafia like groups are clearly involved in pesticide marketing and distribution and they also cover some government agents. Unfortunately the recent Global political problems and also the very recent food and environmental crisis are adding to the problem by widening the gap between North as the provider of these compounds and also the place of research bodies and regulatory agencies and South as the receiver of these compounds (sometimes as gift!) and as the blind consumer. Perhaps the worst part of governments and political roles in this bad scenario in developing countries is that all of international conventions that deal with Global pesticide/ chemical problems are in the hand of governments in developing countries and in absolute control of them and this is a big problem. These governments simply and rudely send their political and in most cases non-scientific agents to these international conventions like Stockholm, Basel, IFCS etc. and in surprise these international conventions accept these governmental agents instead of genuine scientific people. Now in the 21 Century it is the time that those people involved in international conventions give more opportunities to representatives of NGOs from developing countries, to the real academic/ scientific people from developing countries instead of only dealing with governments.
Role of scientific/ academic research: Unfortunately academics and those scientists employed by these governments cannot do so much to solve the problem. In most of these developing countries research funds are not available or if it is, is not distributed correctly to reach the real final scientist to conduct the research. Due to the lack of local research on pesticide/ chemicals in these countries scientists use those regulations provided by researchers from developed World and also from Global regulatory agencies and this in part makes more problems. For example regulations written for developed countries are not suited for developing countries due to the lack of proper infrastructures and also different consuming/ eating habits. In oil producing developing countries allocation of the research money is not correct and is never distributed according to the need and according to the country's problem but unfortunately the money is simply allocated to unnecessary programs and in most of these countries to research on military etc.
Consumer lack of knowledge in developing countries: One big difference between consumers in Northern and Southern countries is level of knowledge of final consumers. In developed countries not only most of people are more scientifically educated as compared to the people in developing countries but also many other factors help the final consumer in developed World about compounds like pesticides. In developed countries many NGOs and community workers are working to make the people aware about what they consume and eat but in developing countries not only the existence of NGOs is under threat but also there is no community work.
With best regards,
Ahmad Mahdavi, PhD, pesticide environmental toxicologist, Sustainable agriculture and environment, Guelph, Ontario., bugmahda@yahoo.com and biomahda@gmail.com.

! Login below to post a comment.

Registered users, log in here
E-mail 
Password 
Remember me
 HELP! I forget my password

Unregistered users, sign up now

Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Your comment (No HTML allowed, use these special codes instead)
Violating our Terms of Service may result in your post being removed.

Special codes
  • [b]selected text[/b] -- Display the selected text in bold.
  • [i]selected text[/i] -- Display the selected text in italics.
  • [link]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags.
  • [link title="Seattle Post-Intelligencer"]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags, uses title as link text.
  • [mail]newmedia@seattlepi.com[/mail] -- Creates a link to an email address.
Enter the code shown:
What is this?
SUBSCRIBE

RSS
Headline widget

BLOGGER BIO
photo
Andrew Schneider: Senior correspondent / investigations
ARCHIVES
Search this blog

Recent entries
· Antibiotics used on animals are absorbed by vegetables grown in land fertilized with animal waste.
· In pursuit of laundered Chinese honey or, have I wasted the past five months of my life?
· Sometimes it's hard to please Congress. I'm sure the FDA see it that way today.
· Feds don't require animal tests on engineered food. But Austria's government did and found problems in modified corn.
· Consumers want more and tougher food safety efforts

Browse by month
Browse by category

RSS/Web feeds (help)
RSS 2.0RSS 1.0Atom
Headlines for your site

LINKS

· The Pump Handle
· Environmental Heallth News
· Hazatds Recognzed
· Environmental Health Perspectives
· Occupational Hazards
· The Daiy Kos
· The Perishable Pundit
· The Daily Green
· Jen Sass

Most recent posts
· Talkin' Hawks: Ruskell speaks
· The Microsoft Blog: Yahoo and Google respond to Microsoft's Verizon deal
· The Big Blog: Flood is dangerous, but also fascinating

*Would you like to blog for us?

ADVERTISING
Advertising

Seattle Post-Intelligencer
101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000

Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.

Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Hearst Newspapers