![]() |
« What does gas have to do with the price of bean? | Main | Congressional committee wants to subpoena company boss to tell what led to largest meat recall in history »
It was an exciting time for EPA scientists in May 2005 when Stephen Johnson was sworn in as the 11th administrator of the beleaguered agency. He was the first scientist to hold the top position and it was hoped by many that his 27 years of working the trenches would be a signal to the Bush administration that the agency would no longer be hampered by political kowtowing to industry and politicians who put favors before public health and the environment.

The agency has had the best and the worst of leaders. William Ruckelshaus was the EPA's first boss and set a tone for integrity, influence and protecting the environment rarely matched by his successors. There was Anne Gorsuch, who resigned under fire in 1983 during a scandal over mismanagement of programs to clean toxic dumps. She also gutted clean water rules. Christine Todd Whitman had many believing early on that she would support the scientists and investigators against political pressure. But in the end, she blindly followed White House orders after 9/11 to get Wall Street opened as quickly as possible. She told New Yorkers that the dust they were breathing from the attacks was harmless, which it obviously wasn't.
It didn't take long to see signs that Johnson forgot those scientists he left behind. The administrator stood silent when agency scientists and ethicists from coast-to-coast denounced the sometimes inhuman testing of pesticides on children.
In a stinging rebuke, unions representing the vast majority of EPA scientists, lawyers and other specialists Monday vowed to cut off future discussions with Johnson.
According to a letter released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. Johnson, already in the hot seat for overruling staff advice that he was legally required to grant California's requested waiver to regulate greenhouse gases, faces a litany of charges that he has also been duplicitous on an array of other scientific integrity, information suppression and workplace relations issues, said PEER.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Recent entries
· Industry wins. Country of origin must now be listed on food labels, but the new law is riddled with dangerous loopholes.
· A federal court ruled against a city for using an untested procedure for removing asbestos. EPA wants to use it nationwide.
· After 19 years of trying, another effort to ban asbestos has surfaced in the House. Keep your fingers crossed.
· Industry to pay federal scientists to issue report on microwave radiation. Do you have a problem with this?
· Lawyers take millions while asbestos victims get $8.12. But don't rush to shoot all of them. Some are heroes.
RSS/Web feeds (help)




· The Pump Handle
· Environmental Heallth News
· Hazatds Recognzed
· Environmental Health Perspectives
· Occupational Hazards
· The Daiy Kos
· The Perishable Pundit
· The Daily Green
· Jen Sass

Reader blog: Everyday Athlete
Reader blog: Run Diva Run
Reader blog: Hormonally Challenged
Reader blog: Graceful Aging
Reader blog: Lemon Margaritas
more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by AvalancheChief at 3/3/08 3:38 p.m.
Less than a year of this - Can't say Amerika voted for Bush in 2000, but they sure did in 2004 - hope you're enjoying it!