![]() |
« Larsen backs Obama | Main | It ain't over 'til it's over »
The Los Angeles Times continues to plumb former SeaTac Airport Director Gina Marie Lindsey's past to gain insight into the allegations that she improperly steered $66.5 million worth of contracts to two preferred companies in her current job as head of LAX and three other LA airports.
The Los Angeles City Council and the city controller's office are reviewing whether Lindsey gave the contracts to favored firms after airport review panels first recommended other companies for the job. On Tuesday, the council asserted jurisdiction over one of the contracts, giving it the power to recommend that the agreement be approved or rejected.
Lindsey demurred when asked about the Washington state audit of the Port of Seattle's procurement and construction management which discovered similar and much more egregious abuses of power which violated state law and port policy, some of which occurred on her watch, which ended in 2004. The audit has spurred a federal criminal investigation.
Lindsey, who was appointed the executive director of Los Angeles World Airports in May, on Tuesday defended her 11-year stint as Seattle's aviation director, saying the port agency had wide discretion on contracts and the agreements in question were either approved by the port commission or her boss, the chief executive of the port.
"If there was something I had done outside my authority, I would have been contacted as part of the audit. No one has ever contacted me," said Lindsey, who directed the renovation of the Seattle airport. "No one has done a major program without doing things that can't be improved upon. There are things that can be learned from the audit."
But Lindsey said that she has been gone so long from Seattle that she was no longer "competent or able to address the details of the audit."
...
Mindy Chambers, a spokeswoman for the Washington state auditor, said Lindsey and port officials are not specifically named in the audit and that the day-to-day contracting work was often delegated to lower-level contract supervisors.
But she said that Lindsey would have had some responsibility over procurements and knowledge of contracts awarded by her division.
Most of the L.A. port commissioners, who like Lindsey are appointed by L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, said they were satisfied with her denial of any impropriety at LAX. Lindsey said the review panel wanted more information about the bidders and requested a second review which reversed one of their endorsements.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)


| May 2008 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Recent entries
· Game of the states: the electoral map
· Foreign policy: the long and short of it
· Appeasers? Really? From a Bush?
· Seattle cabbies & cab owners square off
· Hillary for VP? It may be her call
· McDermott endorses Obama
· The truth about Barack Obama
· Local NARAL chapter stays neutral
RSS/Web feeds (help)




· Blognetnews.com/Washington
· Sound Politics
· HorsesAss
· The Stranger's Slog
· Register to vote
· Washington State Public Disclosure Commission
· Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission

Strange Bedfellows
more
more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by unregistered user at 5/8/08 5:33 p.m.
Top executives are responsible for things that happen under their watch and she shouldn't deny that by stating that the investigators at Sea-Tac haven't implicated her.
Look what president Bush has gone through for everything that has happen whether he knew about it or not. So why shouldn't she ?