![]() |
« Obama besting Romney, McCain | Main | Romney rules Evergreen State fundraising roost »
Chris McGann, the P-I's Olympia correspondent, has a story in Monday's paper detailing how lawmakers will likely have to raise taxes yet again to pay for the 520 bridge rebuild.
That's despite having raised the gas tax twice since '03. Even if Puget Sound voters approve a $16 billion roads and transit package in November (and people aren't lining up to bet on the package's chances of passing) more money will still be needed for 520.
Here's what some lawmakers told McGann:
"The next time we reach into the taxpayers' pockets ... we have to fully fund 520," said Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, who is leading an effort to provide a complete finance plan for the 520 project.
"It has to be safety first, fix it first. Of all the projects on (the November tax package) list, 520 is simply unsafe and we need to replace it. We shouldn't be spreading billions of dollars throughout the region when we have not fully funded the bridge that could fall into the lake and kill many people."
Sen. Dan Swecker, R-Rochester, said it's unrealistic to think the Legislature will be able to go back to the voter again to raise taxes for 520.
"It's such a Herculean effort trying to get the votes," said Swecker, who lead the effort to build Republican support for the 9.5-cent-per gallon gas tax increase. "Back then, I came home and my wife asked how it was going. I told her 'I wish I was back in Vietnam' .... I'd never do it again."
Swecker said the Legislature authorized the regional transportation taxes with the understanding the Puget Sound Mega-projects would be funded.
"One assumption was the replacement of the Alaskan Way Viaduct and the other assumption was the 520 bridge," he said. "People here are dismayed that those two issues are significantly outstanding. My assessment is that the vote in the fall will not pass unless the voter perception is that those two projects have been sufficiently funded and are on a track for going ahead," Swecker said.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)












Recent entries
· Poll: Palin popularity waning in Alaska?
· Mayor by acclamation?
· Never a Stranger rumor
· Rosencrantz runs again
· Andy Anderson: An appreciation
RSS/Web feeds (help)




· Sound Politics
· HorsesAss
· Hattie's Hat
· Dive Bars
· Washington state fiscal info
· Buckley's
· Register to vote
· Spring Lounge
· The Fishbowl
· Washington State Public Disclosure Commission
· The Stranger's Slog
· Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission
· Blognetnews.com/Washington

Strange Bedfellows
more
more
more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by husky fan at 4/16/07 7:34 a.m.
Why didn't Ed Murray and the legislature fully fund 520 when he had the chance in 2005? Murray and the rest spent the money on I 405 instead.
The state Senate has already presented a way to pay for 520 in its transportation budget that doesn't rely on new taxes.
So why does the story report that new taxes will be needed even after the RTID vote.
Seems like there are two leading options: the Senate plan and the Murphy plan.
But niether one works without passage of the ballot measure this fall. So it turns out that the Governor is right: it is way premature to consider the full funding mechanisms. There are viable options. But it is too soon to choose.