Skip ads and navigation
Advertising
Our network sites seattlepi.comHelp
Editor's note: This is a P-I Reader Blog. P-I Reader Blogs are not written or edited by the P-I. They are written by readers, for readers. The authors are solely responsible for content. If you see any posts you consider inappropriate, please send us a note at newmedia@seattlepi.com.
· Want to blog for the P-I?
Print thisE-mail this
Obama was cool and alright. Rhetorical? Yes. Concrete? No.

Ya, I was at Key Arena on Friday, 10.30 am, freezing rain, wind in my face, standing in line to see Barak Obama. I didn't exercise my press credentials because I wasn't covering the Obamamania. So there I stood with the wind blowing my hair everywhere, watching the little girls pulled out of class by their parents, some even bringing their babies, people of all races together talking freely about Obamamania...

Hillary polarizes people, while Obama brings them together, even motivating me- all Indian young people have this apathy, anger, if not hatred, for the politicians- to come see him in person. I prefer him over Hillary but I am not thrilled with him, yet. I remember hearing on the radio last year that Hillary once made upwards of a $100,000 after getting an insider trading tip. Totally unethical and she's not even apologized for it! I also think that years spent with a philandering husband, and buying the silence of his "other women" has got to leave any sane person quite deeply damaged. To be honest, I think the Clintons are a package of spin, and their powerful friends keep them fed on this "But, YOU are fabulous, who else but YOU to lead us?" lobster fiesta. Hillary is too "packaged" for me.

Last summer, in a chat with a San Fran Obama groupie, I'd shared that as journalists, our job was to report the facts completely, and truly. It's not for us to take sides and skew public opinion based on assumptions. I told her that it was my opinion, that Americans wanted change, over "experience" and a rehash of the same old political games.

Lo and behold, in no time, this is what the first voter results started saying too, and it took no time for the candidates to start saying they were the ones with "real change" on their minds.

But, what ARE those new ideas? Where are they? Are they too afraid to be shot down? Are these candidates' offices full of spin doctors, and poll pundits? Why do they not employ think tanks to come up with solutions to global problems? What is their answer to Outsourcing? To the war? To Pakistan? To education? We're hearing, "Ya, we've gonna do great things", but have no idea what they may be?!? How can they convince a whole country to vote them into power without concretely sharing their ideas? Isn't that absurd?

Posted by at February 10, 2008 9:15 p.m.
Comments
#97138

Posted by unregistered user at 2/11/08 1:42 a.m.

I think its quite odd and disingenuous that people talk about Obama without ever asking for specifics.
Unifying without a purpose is useless.
He lacks specificity and while I would like to meet him at a dinner, Hillary can get the job, with all the job's warts , done.
Someone who talks about unilateral action against Pakistan( and Iam not pakistani) needs to get grounded in the realities of the subconintent. Obama is better off keeping his mouth shut on these matters. Has he even traveled outside the US? I hope he does not subscribe to silly arguments such as "DONT buy a Honda because its Japanese", without the recognition of jobs created and done in this country. Who is to ask him for specifics. We are swept up in a Missionary-like zeal!!

I will vote for Obama if he wins. There I am clear, I am a democrat first. I shudder at the thought of a war mongering McCain (thats all he knows) and a religous bigot like Huckabee.

Murali

#98386

Posted by unregistered user at 2/13/08 11:30 p.m.

I believe people never wote for ideas, but for personalities. In Russia I hear onece an advice: think with how will you leave your child over a day? - then you will understand for whom to vote.

! Login below to post a comment.

Registered users, log in here
E-mail 
Password 
Remember me
 HELP! I forget my password

Unregistered users, sign up now

Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Your comment (No HTML allowed, use these special codes instead)
Violating our Terms of Service may result in your post being removed.

Special codes
  • [b]selected text[/b] -- Display the selected text in bold.
  • [i]selected text[/i] -- Display the selected text in italics.
  • [link]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags.
  • [link title="Seattle Post-Intelligencer"]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags, uses title as link text.
  • [mail]newmedia@seattlepi.com[/mail] -- Creates a link to an email address.
Enter the code shown:
What is this?
BLOGGER BIO
photo
PriyankaJoshi (Priyanka Joshi): Freelance writer
ARCHIVES
July 2008
SMTWTFS
    12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031   
Browse by month

Recent entries
· South Asian Focus Group on Philanthropy
· "So where IS God, Mommeee?" "Exactly where?"
· Sameer Bhatia passes away
· Tim Russert: Heart Health
· Wall St Journal Query
· Hey folks, check out my latest Verve mag article
· "Looking Expensive" and Racialism
· Priyanka Joshi on CNN

Search this blog

RSS/Web feeds (help)
RSS 2.0RSS 1.0Atom
Headlines for your site

Most recent posts
· Mariners blog: Silva the latest casualty for a battered rotation
· Two and a half glasses: The Tasting Room doesn't disappoint
· Secret Ingredients: Public health experts rally to keep EPA from easing asbestos risk rules

*Would you like to blog for us?

ADVERTISING
MySeattlePix
Advertising

Seattle Post-Intelligencer
101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000

Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.

Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Hearst Newspapers