Advertising

Our network sites seattlepi.com

Blogs

Print thisE-mail this
Full text: Ballmer on Microsoft strategy, Johnson exit

Here's the full text of the e-mail that Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer sent to employees this afternoon, following the announcement that Platforms & Services chief Kevin Johnson is leaving the company:

From: Steve Ballmer
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 4:30 PM
To: Microsoft - All Employees
Subject: FY09 Strategic Update

With FY08 complete, I want to discuss my priorities for the year ahead and share my thoughts about the key strategic topics that are on everybody's mind, including Windows, competition with Apple and Google, our software plus services strategy, and Yahoo.

I also have news about an organizational change and a transition in our Senior Leadership Team.

First, I want to thank you for your hard work and the dedication you showed during the past 12 months. FY08 was a milestone year. Our revenue jumped $9.3 billion to more than $60 billion. Operating profit grew 21 percent to $22.5 billion.

These outstanding numbers are the direct result of your commitment to the priorities I outlined last July. A lot has happened since then, but our fundamental strengths, challenges, and strategic goals remain largely the same. Therefore, my priorities are consistent with last year. In FY09 we must continue to:

1. Invest in the right opportunities;

2. Expand our presence with Windows, Office, and developers;

3. Drive end user excitement for our products;

4. Embrace software plus services; and

5. Focus on employee excellence.

By focusing on these five areas, we can continue to grow revenue, increase profit, and expand our market share. These priorities are also critical as we work to address key issues surrounding our business in the coming year:

  • Windows: The success of Windows is our number one job. With SP1 and the work we've done with PC manufacturers and our software ecosystem, we've addressed device and application compatibility issues in Windows Vista. Now it's time to tell our story. In the weeks ahead, we'll launch a campaign to address any lingering doubts our customers may have about Windows Vista. And later this year, you'll see a more comprehensive effort to redefine the meaning and value of Windows for our customers.

    We also have to drive developers to create rich applications for Windows. With Internet Explorer and Silverlight, we have great tools for creating applications that run everywhere. But we also need to make sure developers have the .NET skills to write unique Windows applications using Windows Presentation Foundation. To keep today's Windows applications alive, vibrant, and exciting, we need both--applications that run everywhere and rich client applications.

  • Apple: In the competition between PCs and Macs, we outsell Apple 30-to-1. But there is no doubt that Apple is thriving. Why? Because they are good at providing an experience that is narrow but complete, while our commitment to choice often comes with some compromises to the end-to-end experience. Today, we're changing the way we work with hardware vendors to ensure that we can provide complete experiences with absolutely no compromises. We'll do the same with phones--providing choice as we work to create great end-to-end experiences.

  • Business and enterprise: Our enterprise and server business has never been stronger--today we are on the verge of becoming the number one enterprise software company. We need to continue to push on all fronts--mail with Exchange, business intelligence with PerformancePoint, virtualization with Hyper-V, and databases with SQL Server. We have to drive our enterprise search capabilities, our unified communications solutions, and our collaboration technologies. And we must continue to compete against Linux in key workloads such as Web servers and high performance computing.

  • Software plus services: Some people think software plus services is all about search. But it's really about changing the way software is written and deployed. The future is about having a platform in the cloud and delivering applications across PCs, phones, TVs, and other devices, at work and in the home. It's also about driving change in business models through advertising, subscriptions, and online transactions. Software plus services is a huge opportunity for us to deliver new value on the desktop and the server to all of our customers. This year at PDC, you'll hear more about our cloud platform initiatives and the next versions of our Live and Online technologies.

  • Google: We continue to compete with Google on two fronts--in the enterprise, where we lead; and in search, where we trail. In search, our technology has come a long way in a very short time and it's an area where we'll continue to invest to be a market leader. Why? Because search is the key to unlocking the enormous market opportunities in advertising, and it is an area that is ripe for innovation. In the coming years, we'll make progress against Google in search first by upping the ante in R&D through organic innovation and strategic acquisitions. Second, we will out-innovate Google in key areas--we're already seeing this in our maps and news search. Third, we are going to reinvent the search category through user experience and business model innovation. We'll introduce new approaches that move beyond a white page with 10 blue links to provide customers with a customized view of their world. This is a long-term battle for our company--and it's one we'll continue to fight with persistence and tenacity.

  • Yahoo: Related to Google and our search strategy are the discussions we had with Yahoo. I want to emphasize the point I've been making all along--Yahoo was a tactic, not a strategy. We want to accelerate our share of search queries and create a bigger pool of advertisers, and Yahoo would have helped us get there faster. But we will get there with or without Yahoo. We have the right people, we've made incredible progress in our technology, and we'll continue to make smart investments that will enable us to build an industry-leading business.

    As I mentioned earlier, I have important organizational news. Today we are announcing that the Platforms and Services Division will be split into two businesses: Windows/Windows Live and Online Services. We are also announcing that Kevin Johnson will leave the company. He will work to ensure a smooth transition.

    Since 1992, Kevin has been a key contributor to many of this company's most important achievements. As president of the Platforms and Services Division, Kevin has built an incredibly talented organization and laid the foundation for the future success of Windows and our Online Services Business. Over the last 16 years, through everything from his work as head of the company's worldwide sales, marketing, and services efforts, to his leadership in transforming our field operations and repositioning the company to focus on opportunities in emerging markets, Kevin has played a vital role in this company's success. There is no doubt that his passion and dedication will be missed.

    Effective immediately, Steven Sinofsky, Jon DeVaan, and Bill Veghte will report directly to me to lead Windows/Windows Live. In the Online Services Business, we will create a new senior leadership position and conduct a search that will span internal and external candidates. In the meantime, Satya Nadella will continue to lead Microsoft's search, ad platform, and MSN engineering efforts, and Brian McAndrews will continue to lead the Advertiser and Publisher Solutions Group. Both Windows/Windows Live and the Online Services Business are led by a strong group of executives on the technical and business side who have the talent and experience to address the challenges we face and drive the next generation of growth and success.

    Looking ahead, I see an incredibly bright future for our company. As I said at the June 27th Town Hall for Bill, we are the best in the world at doing software and nobody should be confused about this. It doesn't mean that we can't improve, but nobody is better than we are. Nobody works harder than we do. Nobody is more tenacious than we are. We're investing more broadly and more seriously than anybody else. Our opportunities to change the world have never been greater.

    I look forward to working with all of you as we focus on our five priorities in FY09.

    Steve

  • Posted by at July 23, 2008 5:40 p.m.
    Categories: , ,
    Comments
    #154650

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/23/08 6:27 p.m.

    Does anyone know what Ballmer means by this: "I want to emphasize the point I've been making all along--Yahoo was a tactic, not a strategy."

    I'm a Microsoft employee. I've heard him say this several times now, and I have no idea what point he's trying to make. Is this some sort of business-speak code? What is the difference between a strategy and a tactic? Or what difference is he suggesting?

    Maybe everyone else knows what he means. I can tell that he earnestly is trying to convey something by this statement, but I have no idea what.

    #154669

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/23/08 7:02 p.m.

    Strategy: a carefully devised plan of action to achieve a goal, or the art of developing or carrying out such a plan.

    Tactic: means to goal, a method used or a course of action followed in order to achieve an immediate or short-term goal.

    A tactic is but one move in an overall larger strategy.

    #154681

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/23/08 7:37 p.m.

    That's what stumped me. A strategy is a carefully devised plan of action.

    Why would a CEO take pains to point out that the action he's been taking is not a carefully devised plan of action?

    I believe you're saying that he's saying, Hey, folks, this isn't all there is; we actually do have a plan.

    #154706

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/23/08 8:50 p.m.

    "We're investing more broadly and more seriously than anybody else."

    With what to show for it? Ballmer confuses wasting serious amounts of money on an endless array of failing projects, with broadly investing seriously.

    #154725

    Posted by LenC at 7/23/08 9:52 p.m.

    Achieving tactical goals improves your business' key performance measures - OS and app license revenue, units shipped, etc.

    Achieving strategic goals changes your key performance indicators - impression volume, clicks, conversion lift etc.

    #154726

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/23/08 9:58 p.m.

    Aha, so it is business speak! Thanks LenC.

    Business people seem unaware that 99 percent of the people they're talking to (employees, customers) don't know that jargon. To send a note to the entire company with such a statement in it suggests a certain, umm, insularity.

    Now if you can just get them to stop saying "going forward" in every sentence.

    "I'm going to use more cliches in my speech going forward."

    #154727

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/23/08 9:59 p.m.

    " Apple: In the competition between PCs and Macs, we outsell Apple 30-to-1."

    Clueless as always. Apple is on track to sell close to or more than 10 million computers this year. Microsoft is on track to sell 0 computers this year.

    I'll give him due credit for acknowledging this simple fact referring to the Apple experience vs. the Microsoft experience.

    "Because they are good at providing an experience that is narrow but complete, while our commitment to choice often comes with some compromises to the end-to-end experience."

    He loses some of that credit due to the chasm between "some compromises" and the bloody awful experience it's been for many Windows users.

    How he would coerce competitors like Dell and HP into making the box he would desire will be interesting (I'm really guessing humorous) to watch. It's a fundamental disconnect of what he's portraying vs. what he really has the ability to control or produce.

    #154728

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/23/08 10:00 p.m.

    "conversion lift"

    #154803

    Posted by Carlos Hawes at 7/24/08 6:23 a.m.

    The lifeboats are filling up fast on the HMS Redmond! Get your seat now while there is still time!

    #154900

    Posted by anonymuos at 7/24/08 11:01 a.m.

    "Microsoft is on track to sell 0 computers this year." Go away troll, we all know what he means, they do not have to sell directly to users.

    #154977

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/24/08 1:22 p.m.

    The lifeboats are filling up fast on the HMS Redmond! Get your seat now while there is still time!

    Our revenue jumped $9.3 billion to more than $60 billion. Operating profit grew 21 percent to $22.5 billion.

    Sure the "lifeboats" are filling up fast ... with MONEY. What's Apple's bottom line ?
    Google's ?

    #155013

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/24/08 2:28 p.m.

    cquirke here, answering the question...

    'Does anyone know what Ballmer means by this: "I want to emphasize the point I've been making all along--Yahoo was a tactic, not a strategy." '

    Strategy is about objectives, and tactics is about how to get there. Think "ends" vs. "means". So, acquiring Yahoo was not a goal in itself, therefore not aquiring Yahoo is not a failure in itself.

    Acquiring Yahoo was a way to speed up the attainment of other goals, such as boosted search market share and ad revenue, where Yahoo's main value may be the lock-in they attain via their relationships with ISPs and other unrelated vendors (e.g. they run the mail service back-end for several large ISPs, are bundled with other products, are welded into Safari as the alternate search engine, and so on).

    To me, that suggests there's less technological value in Yahoo, than there is market leverage - and using leverage that isn't quality-driven (i.e. hasn't attracted willing users, but been foisted on them via bundling deals).

    With that in mind, Yahoo's worth buying if the price is right, but isn't a core tech resource MS "needs" as such. If MS's goal is to be a genuinely better and more popular search than Google, they are not going to get that off the peg by buying Yahoo.

    #155058

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/24/08 3:59 p.m.

    Microsoft is indeed in trouble. There's way too much overhead in the company with thousands directors and no implementers, hence the need for outsourcing. Company is now greater than 90k people and they still can't innovate or release competitive products. Eliminate 75% of levels 65 - 80, kill certain sacred cows (automotive, tablet, Zune, XBox (ouch...)) and wach the value of your MSFT stock go through the roof. Focus your core strength, MSFT - Platforms, Tools and Applications. Stock has bounced around the $25 mark for several years. Bill, Steve and the Board do not want to create a value stock, hence the spend on worthless projects that any startup would have killed or be killed long before spending $billions. This is the primary reason why John Connors left. There is almost no bench left at the senior level with the possible exception of Bob Muglia. Veghte and crew might be smart, but they're Bill and Steve clones. Kevin Johnson leaving is a serious blow as he was one of the good guys who I have respected for years.

    #155071

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/24/08 4:25 p.m.

    It is interesting to see that a CEO's focus is not innovation but competition with existing giants in the marketplace. This is the first step towards a disaster. Today its Yahoo, Apple, Google. Tomorrow something else comes up and all Microsoft will do is try to keep up. Sigh! I hope Linux variants kill Windows some day.

    #155076

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/24/08 4:33 p.m.

    The only reason Microsoft has been successful is:
    1980's - Stealing code from Xerox, rightfully owned by Apple
    1990's - Using under-the-table kickbacks and their monopoly to crush competition unethically
    What's with Bill Gates? First he kills enough startups unethically and now works in the non-profit foundation. Lo and behold, the investment management arm of the foundation invests in companies which are mean, unethical and the cause of problems that the Foundation is trying to resolve in first place. What a shame and what an eyewash!
    And yes, Ballmer does not have any mention in my post coz he does not even deserve it. *Smiles wickedly*

    #155133

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/24/08 5:45 p.m.

    Here's the suggestions for ultimate win!

    1. Invest in the right opportunities
    ++ On-campus Brewery (with BEER) for Bluebadgers.

    2. Expand our presence with Windows, Office, and
    developers;
    ++ Invite Vendors to our Brewery for BEER.

    3. Drive end user excitement for our products;
    ++ Can we give them a FREE MS BEER with every license?

    4. Embrace software plus services; and
    ++ How about a ordering button for BEER in outlook? That's a Software-based service I'd pay for.

    5. Focus on employee excellence.
    ++ Everyone's excellent after a few BEERS. So let's add a keg into the Connector Buses. With that guy driving, what's not to like?

    #155219

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/24/08 7:33 p.m.

    On Yahoo:

    Ballmer is like the sleezy guy who goes in for a second grope after being slapped the first time.

    #155289

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/24/08 10:03 p.m.

    The last 2 comments are so f***ing hilarious :) I still remember the Monkey dance Ballmer did few years back.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvsboPUjrGc

    Seems like he has not evolved yet!!

    #155898

    Posted by unregistered user at 7/26/08 3:21 p.m.

    {1980's - Stealing code from Xerox, rightfully owned by Apple}

    Wow, is that a warped viewpoint. If anybody stole the code from Xerox PARC it was Apple, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer,_Inc._v._Microsoft_Corporation

    #233753

    Posted by unregistered user at 12/27/08 8:35 a.m.

    No matter how hard MS try, they have miss the best opportunity to beat Google. The reason is their pride.
    -------
    seatlepi air jordan

    ! Login below to post a comment.

    Registered users, log in here
    E-mail 
    Password 
    Remember me
     HELP! I forget my password

    Unregistered users, sign up now

    Or post anonymously (About this feature)

    Your comment (No HTML allowed, use these special codes instead)
    Violating our Terms of Service may result in your post being removed.

    Special codes
    • [b]selected text[/b] -- Display the selected text in bold.
    • [i]selected text[/i] -- Display the selected text in italics.
    • [link]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags.
    • [link title="Seattle Post-Intelligencer"]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags, uses title as link text.
    • [mail]newmedia@seattlepi.com[/mail] -- Creates a link to an email address.
    Enter the code shown:
    What is this?
    SUBSCRIBE

    RSS
    Headline widget

    BLOGGER BIO
    photo
    Joseph Tartakoff: P-I staff reporter
    SUBMIT A TIP

    E-mail or call 206-448-8221 with tips or ideas

    FEATURED COMMENT

    PictureQ: Why can't Microsoft buy 'Coolness'? A: Because Coolness has a poison pill in its contract in the event of a Microsoft takeover.
    -- Reader on Microsoft to sell line of "softwear"-labeled shirts

    MSFT: DAILY TREND

    TOPIC: WINDOWS 7

    · Microsoft polishes Vista into Windows 7
    · Microsoft details Windows 7 features
    ·
    Reviewers mostly applaud Windows 7
    · All stories and posts

    FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER

    twitter.com/josephtartakoff

      RECOMMENDED READING
      ARCHIVES
      Search this blog

      Recent entries
      · Video: Sing a melody and Microsoft will provide the backup
      · Microsoft announces new search deals with Dell, Verizon
      · Liveblogging Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's CES keynote
      · Microsoft puts search for more Seattle space on hold
      · Noted: Windows 7 beta to be released by next Tuesday

      Browse by month
      Browse by category
      LINKS

      Microsoft News
      · Microsoft PressPass
      · Directions on Microsoft
      · WinInsider
      · ActiveWin
      · NetworkWorld: Microsoft
      · Microsoft Research News
      · Channel 9
      · OS News
      · Microsoft SEC filings
      · WinInfo
      · Microsoft Confidential
      · Bink.nu

      Microsoft Blogs
      · Ed Bott
      · Mary Jo Foley
      · Ina Fried
      · LiveSide
      · Emil Protalinski
      · Rafael Rivera Jr.
      · Paul Thurrott
      · Joe Wilcox
      · Long Zheng

      Microsoft Employees
      · Employee Blog Portal
      · S. Somasegar
      · Raymond Chen
      · Dare Obasanjo
      · Brad Abrams
      · Heather Hamilton
      · Chris Anderson
      · Joshua Allen
      · Chris Sells
      · John Porcaro
      · John Montgomery
      · Kevin Schofield
      · Sean Alexander
      · Jobs Blog
      · Harry Pierson
      · Mini-Microsoft

      Technology Blogs
      · Robert Scoble
      · Paul McNamara
      · Dwight Silverman
      · Charlene Li
      · Joel Spolsky
      · Engadget
      · Gizmodo
      · Simon Phipps
      · Paul Andrews
      · Chris Pirillo

      Search-related sites
      · John Battelle
      · Greg Linden
      · Yahoo! Search Blog
      · Live Search Blog
      · Google Blog
      · Search Engine Watch

      Browser-related sites
      · Internet Explorer team
      · mozillaZine
      · Surfin' Safari
      · Browser News

      Antitrust info
      · FindLaw: Microsoft
      · DOJ Microsoft site
      · Microsoft legal site
      · Findings of Fact
      · ComputerWorld Report
      · Sun legal page
      · Dan Kegel's antitrust site

      TECH EVENTS

      · Washington Technology Industry Association
      *all tech events

      ADVERTISING

      Most recent posts
      · Northwest Law: Representing Yourself?
      · Dateline Earth: Unusual Cloud Forest dance show in Seattle this week
      · Devouring sEATtle: Goodbye to another Seattle institution

      *Would you like to blog for us?

      Advertising

      Seattle Post-Intelligencer
      101 Elliott Ave. W.
      Seattle, WA 98119
      (206) 448-8000

      Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820

      Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
      ©1996-2008 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
      Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

      Hearst Newspapers