![]() |
« PS3 tops Xbox 360 in May game console sales | Main | Microsoft team close to finishing Gobi March »
In an e-mail to employees this afternoon, a Microsoft executive disclosed details of the alternative proposal that Yahoo turned down yesterday before announcing its search-advertising partnership with Google. According to the message from Kevin Johnson, president of Microsoft's Platforms and Services Division, the company offered $1 billion for Yahoo's search assets, plus an $8 billion investment in Yahoo, at $35 per share.
See these earlier posts for statements from Google and Yahoo. Here's an excerpt from Johnson's e-mail to Microsoft employees, which also reads as a thinly veiled message to Yahoo shareholders.
During the last few weeks, we spent a considerable amount of time with Yahoo! discussing an alternative proposal around search. Specifically, this search proposal had three components:Microsoft would have invested $8 billion in Yahoo! at $35/share; Microsoft would have purchased Yahoo!'s search assets for $1 billion, and assumed the operations and R&D expense while returning data back to Yahoo! for use in their advertising business; and Microsoft and Yahoo! would have entered into a long-term search partnership, where Microsoft would have provided favorable economics to Yahoo! search, including a three-year guarantee of higher monetization than Yahoo!'s Panama paid search system currently provides. This partnership would have created a stronger competitor to Google, providing greater choice and innovation for advertisers, publishers and consumers. This approach could have been implemented quickly and would have simplified the integration process for both parties. It would have also established the basis for a long-term Internet partnership between Yahoo! and Microsoft.
We believe this proposal would have created compelling value for Yahoo! and its shareholders in at least three ways:
New Transfer of Cash to Yahoo! Shareholders. This proposal would have transferred $9 billion from Microsoft to Yahoo!, which could have been used by Yahoo! to reward their shareholders. A More Profitable Ongoing Business. This proposal would have resulted in higher operating income on an annual basis for Yahoo!, with our projections more than doubling Yahoo!'s operating income in the first year of operation, and increasing it by more than $1 billion above its current operating income level. A More Compelling Search Offering. The combination of the search platforms would have unlocked new R&D innovation, eliminated redundant engineering efforts and allowed for greater scale in serving our customers. Unfortunately Yahoo! has chosen a different course, and yesterday announced an agreement that would start to consolidate over 90% of the paid search advertising market in Google's hands. This will make the market far less competitive. There are many experts who suggest that a host of legal and regulatory problems lie ahead for Google and Yahoo!.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)

E-mail or call 206-448-8221 with tips or ideas
Q: Why can't Microsoft buy 'Coolness'? A: Because Coolness has a poison pill in its contract in the event of a Microsoft takeover.
-- Reader on Microsoft to sell line of "softwear"-labeled shirts
· Microsoft polishes Vista into Windows 7
· Microsoft details Windows 7 features
· Reviewers mostly applaud Windows 7
· All stories and posts
Recent entries
· Video: Sing a melody and Microsoft will provide the backup
· Microsoft announces new search deals with Dell, Verizon
· Liveblogging Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's CES keynote
· Microsoft puts search for more Seattle space on hold
· Noted: Windows 7 beta to be released by next Tuesday
Microsoft News
· Microsoft PressPass
· Directions on Microsoft
· WinInsider
· ActiveWin
· NetworkWorld: Microsoft
· Microsoft Research News
· Channel 9
· OS News
· Microsoft SEC filings
· WinInfo
· Microsoft Confidential
· Bink.nu
Microsoft Blogs
· Ed Bott
· Mary Jo Foley
· Ina Fried
· LiveSide
· Emil Protalinski
· Rafael Rivera Jr.
· Paul Thurrott
· Joe Wilcox
· Long Zheng
Microsoft Employees
· Employee Blog Portal
· S. Somasegar
· Raymond Chen
· Dare Obasanjo
· Brad Abrams
· Heather Hamilton
· Chris Anderson
· Joshua Allen
· Chris Sells
· John Porcaro
· John Montgomery
· Kevin Schofield
· Sean Alexander
· Jobs Blog
· Harry Pierson
· Mini-Microsoft
Technology Blogs
· Robert Scoble
· Paul McNamara
· Dwight Silverman
· Charlene Li
· Joel Spolsky
· Engadget
· Gizmodo
· Simon Phipps
· Paul Andrews
· Chris Pirillo
Search-related sites
· John Battelle
· Greg Linden
· Yahoo! Search Blog
· Live Search Blog
· Google Blog
· Search Engine Watch
Browser-related sites
· Internet Explorer team
· mozillaZine
· Surfin' Safari
· Browser News
Antitrust info
· FindLaw: Microsoft
· DOJ Microsoft site
· Microsoft legal site
· Findings of Fact
· ComputerWorld Report
· Sun legal page
· Dan Kegel's antitrust site
more
more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
©1996-2008 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by unregistered user at 6/13/08 4:53 p.m.
Sounds like a lot of sour grapes to me. Microsoft folks, get over the fact that some people just don't like you and never will. Do the right thing. Stop acting juvenile and move on.