![]() |
« Microsoft NASCAR sponsorship takes bad turn | Main | Microsoft launches new Live Search News site »
The May issue of Popular Mechanics arrived this week with an interesting feature comparing Macs and Windows PCs, in desktops and notebook categories. The magazine assessed system performance by measuring how quickly the computers booted up, shut down, and installed and launched common programs. It assessed overall user experience with a panel of testers representing a range of computer experience.
Here's the twist: Macs might have a reputation for superior usability, but that's not the main reason they won out, according to the magazine. The entire article is worth checking out, but here's the conclusion:
Mac: In both the laptop and desktop showdowns, Apple's computers were the winners. Oddly, the big difference didn't come in our user ratings, where we expected the famously friendly Mac interface to shine. Our respondents liked the look and feel of both operating systems but had a slight preference toward OS X. In our speed trials, however, Leopard OS trounced Vista in all-important tasks such as boot-up, shutdown and program-launch times. We even tested Vista on the Macs using Apple's platform-switching Boot Camp software -- and found that both Apple computers ran Vista faster than our PCs did.PC: Simply put, Vista proved to be a more sluggish operating system than Leopard. Our PCs installed some software faster, but in general they were slower in our time trials. Plus, both PCs showed weaker performance on third-party benchmarks than the Macs. Our biggest surprise, however, was that PCs were not the relative bargains we expected them to be. The Asus M51sr costs the same as a MacBook, while the Gateway One actually costs $300 more than an iMac. That means for the price of the Gateway you could buy an iMac, boost its hard drive to match the Gateway's, purchase a copy of Vista to boot--and still save $100.
In other words, with Windows Vista, Microsoft appears to have succeeded in improving the operating system's on-screen appeal to users -- the digital eye candy. But the article confirms the general perception that Windows Vista isn't doing as well on the fundamental tasks that, after all, are the reason an operating system exists in the first place.
The article is also starting to get attention elsewhere. Related links:
Web Worker Daily: Mac vs. PC speed: It doesn't matter.
Cult of Mac: Mac trounces PC in Pop Mechanics Head-to-Head.
Michael Parekh: On the new PC vs. Mac reality.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)

E-mail or call 206-448-8221 with tips or ideas
Q: Why can't Microsoft buy 'Coolness'? A: Because Coolness has a poison pill in its contract in the event of a Microsoft takeover.
-- Reader on Microsoft to sell line of "softwear"-labeled shirts
· Microsoft polishes Vista into Windows 7
· Microsoft details Windows 7 features
· Reviewers mostly applaud Windows 7
· All stories and posts
Recent entries
· Video: Sing a melody and Microsoft will provide the backup
· Microsoft announces new search deals with Dell, Verizon
· Liveblogging Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's CES keynote
· Microsoft puts search for more Seattle space on hold
· Noted: Windows 7 beta to be released by next Tuesday
Microsoft News
· Microsoft PressPass
· Directions on Microsoft
· WinInsider
· ActiveWin
· NetworkWorld: Microsoft
· Microsoft Research News
· Channel 9
· OS News
· Microsoft SEC filings
· WinInfo
· Microsoft Confidential
· Bink.nu
Microsoft Blogs
· Ed Bott
· Mary Jo Foley
· Ina Fried
· LiveSide
· Emil Protalinski
· Rafael Rivera Jr.
· Paul Thurrott
· Joe Wilcox
· Long Zheng
Microsoft Employees
· Employee Blog Portal
· S. Somasegar
· Raymond Chen
· Dare Obasanjo
· Brad Abrams
· Heather Hamilton
· Chris Anderson
· Joshua Allen
· Chris Sells
· John Porcaro
· John Montgomery
· Kevin Schofield
· Sean Alexander
· Jobs Blog
· Harry Pierson
· Mini-Microsoft
Technology Blogs
· Robert Scoble
· Paul McNamara
· Dwight Silverman
· Charlene Li
· Joel Spolsky
· Engadget
· Gizmodo
· Simon Phipps
· Paul Andrews
· Chris Pirillo
Search-related sites
· John Battelle
· Greg Linden
· Yahoo! Search Blog
· Live Search Blog
· Google Blog
· Search Engine Watch
Browser-related sites
· Internet Explorer team
· mozillaZine
· Surfin' Safari
· Browser News
Antitrust info
· FindLaw: Microsoft
· DOJ Microsoft site
· Microsoft legal site
· Findings of Fact
· ComputerWorld Report
· Sun legal page
· Dan Kegel's antitrust site
more
more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
©1996-2008 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by fletc3her at 4/16/08 12:25 p.m.
Apple does make quality hardware. From the company that brought you the iPhone, this shouldn't be a big surprise. The fit and finish on Apple stuff is very nice. I'd say comparable to HP, Sony, and IBM (though I've heard Lenovo is going downhill).
The price difference for comparable hardware was largely erased years ago when Apple dropped most of its proprietary hardware. The switch to Intel should have been the end of the "Apple is more expensive" meme, but it lives on.
I am very surprised at how slowly Vista is being adopted. It sounds like in security at least it is head and shoulders above Windows XP. That alone would drive some adoption I would think. But, beyond that I guess I would be hard pressed to name specific features that would seem compelling. Where, Mac OS X Leopard at least had "Time Machine" as a concrete feature that was worth upgrading for.