![]() |
« Full text: Microsoft execs on Vista problems | Main | Microsoft's Greatest Hits: Top 5 internal e-mails »
As reported here yesterday, one of the most eye-catching elements of the newly disclosed internal Microsoft e-mails on Windows Vista was an e-mail from Microsoft's John Kalkman to Scott Di Valerio, then in charge of the company's relations with PC makers.
Read the full text of the Microsoft e-mails: |
An excerpt:
In the end, we lowered the requirement to help Intel make their quarterly earnings so they could continue to sell motherboards with the 915 graphics embedded. This in turn did two things: 1. Decreased focus of OEMs planning and shipping higher end graphics for Vista-ready programs and 2. Reduced the focus by IHV's to ready great WHQL [Windows Hardware Quality Labs] qualified graphics drivers. We can see this today with Intel's inability to ship a compelling full featured 945 graphics driver for Windows Vista.
The notion of Microsoft making the decision specifically to help Intel's quarterly results is drawing some attention in the industry today. Among other things, securities laws regulate selective financial disclosures.
"We don't know who John Kalkman is," said Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy this afternooon. "We do know he's not qualified to know anything about internal Intel financials or forecasts related to chipsets, motherboards or any other products." Mulloy said Kalkman "would have no visibility into our financial needs in any given quarter."
Such an arrangement between Microsoft and Intel would be "questionable, at best," said PC industry analyst Roger Kay of Endpoint Technologies Associates. "A company typically isn't supposed to make as an objective that it helps another company with its earnings unless there's an ownership relationship there. ... If helping Intel helps Microsoft then it could be justified but on the face of it, it sounds a little funny. Why would they be helping Intel unless there's some other quid pro quo that's not in the e-mail?"
Doug Freedman, an analyst for American Technology Research, was less concerned. "There's always a push and pull between hardware and software," Freedman said. "Any new product that's introduced almost always has some sort of user experience compromise incorporated into it, whether it's to reach a price point or whether it's to reach a time-to-market goal."
Theoretically, Microsoft may have benefited if more PCs were seen as capable of running Vista. At the same time, the internal e-mails show that the decision to lower the "Windows Vista Capable" requirements caused consternation within Microsoft, by including machines that couldn't run the new operating system's advanced graphics. It also created friction between the company and partners such as Hewlett-Packard and Wal-Mart.
"We really botched this," wrote Jim Allchin, then Microsoft's Windows chief, in a February 2006 message.
Responded Microsoft's Mike Ybarra: "We are caving to Intel."
In following up on this issue today, I'm talking with experts about the legal implications, and I'll be posting more depending on what I find out. I've also asked a Microsoft representative if the company wants to comment on this specific aspect of the e-mails.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Have a news tip or a comment? E-mail me or call directly, 206-448-8221.
Software? What year is this? Am I in a time machine?"
Entire online ad revenue for 2007 was $20 billion. Entire industry. MSFT alone as a software publisher had $50 billion in revenue for 2007. That's the point."
· Vista at One Year: Progress and Pain
· Computer shop's sales pitch: 'We remove Vista'
· Full text: Microsoft execs on Vista problems
· All stories and posts
Our interactive timeline analyzes three decades of key documents to provide a scrolling snapshot of the issues at the center of Microsoft's consciousness across the years.
| May 2008 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Recent entries
· Next up: A Microsoft-Google antitrust fight?
· News Corp. says no MySpace-Microsoft talks
· Poll: Whom should Microsoft pursue next?
· Opinion: A Microsoft shareholder's manifesto
· Excerpt: Warren Buffett, Bill Gates on Yahoo
· Microsoft's new automotive deal: Hyundai-Kia
· Microsoft adds NBC, other TV shows to Zune
· Reports: Yahoo still 'open' to Microsoft talks
RSS/Web feeds (help)




News and information
· WinInfo
· Microsoft Watch
· Directions on Microsoft
· WinInsider
· ActiveWin
· KOMO News: Microsoft
· NetworkWorld: Microsoft
· Google News: Microsoft
· Yahoo News: Microsoft
· Microsoft Research News
· Microsoft PressPass
· Channel 9
· Anti-Microsoft News
· NewsForge: Linux News
· Linux Today
· Mac News Network
· Mac Daily News
· Washington Post Filter
· G.M. Silicon Valley
· OS News
· Gillmor Gang
Blogs about Microsoft
· Mary Jo Foley: All About Microsoft
· LiveSide.net
· Microsoft Monitor
· Unofficial MSFT Blog
· IW Windows Weblog
· Xbox 2 Blog
· Inside Microsoft
· CNet Microsoft Blog
· Bink.nu
· Long Zheng, istartedsomething.com
· Beyond Binary, Ina Fried of CNet News.com
Computer Security
· Microsoft Security
· Wash. Post Security Fix
· Microsoft Security Response Center Blog
· Be Careful Out There
· Security Awareness Blog
· Bruce Schneier's Blog
· eWeek Security News
· Larry Seltzer
· Symantec Security Resp.
· McAfee Virus Information
· CNet Security Blog
· Security Focus
· Kaspersky Lab Analyst's Weblog
· Michael Howard (MSFT)
· Stephen Toulouse (MSFT)
· Network World Security
· Planet Security
Microsoft employees
· Employee Blog Portal
· MS Watch List
· S. Somasegar
· Raymond Chen
· Dare Obasanjo
· Brad Abrams
· Heather Hamilton
· Korby Parnell
· Matt Goyer
· Don Box
· Chris Anderson
· Joshua Allen
· Chris Sells
· John Porcaro
· John Montgomery
· Kevin Schofield
· Rick Schaut
· Marc Miller
· Sean Alexander
· Larry Hryb
· Jobs Blog
· Greg Roth
· Harry Pierson
· Mini-Microsoft
Search-related sites
· John Battelle
· Greg Linden
· Unofficial Google Blog
· Yahoo! Search Blog
· MSN Sandbox
· MSN Search Weblog
· Google Blog
· Search Engine Lowdown
· Search Engine Watch
· Google Like a Hawk
Browser-related sites
· Internet Explorer team
· mozillaZine
· Surfin' Safari
· Opera news
· Browser News
Technology Weblogs
· Robert Scoble
· Paul McNamara
· Dwight Silverman
· Charlene Li
· Joel Spolsky
· Engadget
· Gizmodo
· Corante Apple Blog
· Amy Wohl
· Dan Gillmor
· Simon Phipps
· Buzz Andersen
· Chris Seper
· Hiawatha Bray
· Paul Andrews
· Doc Searls
· Chris Pirillo
· Campbell & Swigart
· Longhorn Blogs
· PDC Bloggers
Antitrust info
· FindLaw: Microsoft
· DOJ Microsoft site
· Microsoft legal site
· Findings of Fact
· ComputerWorld Report
· Sun legal page
· Dan Kegel's antitrust site
Additional sites
· Google Microsoft Search
· About Microsoft
· Microsoft User Network
· Tablet PC Buzz
· Living Without Microsoft
· Lockergnome
· WSA
· WashTech
· CyberLodge
· Microsoft Permatemps
· Apache Foundation
· Librenex
· Electronic Frontier Foundation
more
more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by Will in Seattle at 2/28/08 4:25 p.m.
Hoist by their own electronic petard.