Skip ads and navigation
Advertising
Our network sites seattlepi.comHelp
Print thisE-mail this
Microsoft's big Yahoo bid: Behind-the-scenes details

Breaking news: Microsoft announced this morning that it's proposing to acquire longtime rival Yahoo for $31 a share, or $44.6 billion. It's a huge move that, if successful, promises to reshape the Internet industry, pitting Microsoft against Google in a head-to-head competition between two online giants.


Picture

Related stories and posts

  • Mainbar: Microsoft offers $45 billion to acquire Yahoo
  • Wall Street reacts
  • Text of CEO Steve Ballmer's e-mail to employees
  • John Cook: Seattle technology community reacts

    Audio extra: Hear me discussing the deal today on NPR's Morning Edition.


  • The announcement follows months of rumors, and for Yahoo, it comes amid a sinking share price and layoff plans. Significantly, it's being made not as an agreement with Yahoo but as a proposal to its board of directors -- from which Yahoo's chairman and former chief executive, Terry Semel, resigned last night, just prior to Microsoft's announcement.

    A letter Thursday to Yahoo's board from Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, made public by Microsoft this morning, reveals details about what has been happening behind the scenes, and about the Redmond company's plan. Excerpts from Ballmer's letter:

    Microsoft's consistent belief has been that the combination of Microsoft and Yahoo! clearly represents the best way to deliver maximum value to our respective shareholders, as well as create a more efficient and competitive company that would provide greater value and service to our customers. In late 2006 and early 2007, we jointly explored a broad range of ways in which our two companies might work together. These discussions were based on a vision that the online businesses of Microsoft and Yahoo! should be aligned in some way to create a more effective competitor in the online marketplace. We discussed a number of alternatives ranging from commercial partnerships to a merger proposal, which you rejected. While a commercial partnership may have made sense at one time, Microsoft believes that the only alternative now is the combination of Microsoft and Yahoo! that we are proposing.

    In February 2007, I received a letter from your Chairman indicating the view of the Yahoo! Board that "now is not the right time from the perspective of our shareholders to enter into discussions regarding an acquisition transaction." According to that letter, the principal reason for this view was the Yahoo! Board's confidence in the "potential upside" if management successfully executed on a reformulated strategy based on certain operational initiatives, such as Project Panama, and a significant organizational realignment. A year has gone by, and the competitive situation has not improved.

    While online advertising growth continues, there are significant benefits of scale in advertising platform economics, in capital costs for search index build-out, and in research and development, making this a time of industry consolidation and convergence. Today, the market is increasingly dominated by one player who is consolidating its dominance through acquisition. Together, Microsoft and Yahoo! can offer a credible alternative for consumers, advertisers, and publishers.

    Microsoft is holding a 5:30 a.m. conference call. More to come.

    Update, 6:30 a.m.: Yahoo's statement: The company's board "will evaluate this proposal carefully and promptly in the context of Yahoo!'s strategic plans and pursue the best course of action to maximize long-term value for shareholders."

    Update, 6:45 a.m.: Here's my initial story on the news, with details from the conference call, plus some analyst reactions.

    Update, 7 a.m.: If this goes through, what becomes of the Yahoo brand? One analyst asked that question during the conference call. In short, it's yet to be determined, or at least yet to be made public. This was the response from Kevin Johnson, president of Microsoft's Platforms & Services Division, on the call.

    "Look, the Yahoo brand is a great brand. We love the Yahoo brand. Part of our integration principles and the learning and working with aQuantive and TellMe is that we want to have clear integration principles and a joint leadership team of Microsoft leaders and Yahoo leaders to really work through the thoughtful process of how you land the specifics on this. We've got clear line of site to the synergies and the value creation we're going to unlock. We've got a clear set of principles, and we're going to go through a thoughtful process with great talent from both Yahoo and Microsoft to really make the specific decisions on how that will land."

    Yahoo shares are up more than 9 percent in pre-market trading, to more than $28. Microsoft shares are down about 4 percent, to about $31.35.

    More to come.

    Update, 7:45 a.m.: The Associated Press reports that the Justice Department is interested in reviewing the proposed deal: "The antitrust division would be interested in looking at the competitive effects of the transaction,'' Justice Department spokeswoman Gina Talamona told the news service.

    "We've worked closely with our legal counsel, and we're confident we can obtain all the necessary approvals in a timely fashion," said Kevin Johnson, president of Microsoft's Platforms & Services Division, in an interview. Microsoft says it expects the deal to close in the second half of the calendar year.

    Update, 8:30 a.m.: What about jobs? On the phone, I asked Johnson about Microsoft's plans for Yahoo's employees, if the deal happens. Here's what he said.

    Well, when you look at the four pillars of synergy that we have, one of those pillars is about expanded R&D capacity. From an engineering standpoint, we're proud of the work Microsoft engineers are doing, we're proud of the work Yahoo engineers are doing, and the combination is going to enable us to do even more work that drives innovation. So from an engineering standpoint, a key part of this is an expanded R&D capability.

    Certainly one of the other pillars is operational efficiencies, and as we look across the integration plans of the two companies, a key part of that will be ensuring that we get the right people in the right jobs and we have the right resources allocated to each function. We're going to have a thoughtful integration process that will include leaders from both companies, and a clear set of integration principles.

    Translation: Johnson's reference to operational efficiencies suggests that there could be job cuts, but the company isn't prepared to say how many it expects.

    This might seem outlandish, but given the size of the deal and Yahoo's big Silicon Valley presence, I asked whether Microsoft would keep its current corporate headquarters. For the record, Johnson said yes, the company plans to remain based in Redmond. (Microsoft also has its own sizable Silicon Valley operations already.)

    Posted by at February 1, 2008 4:20 a.m.
    Categories: , ,
    Comments
    #93210

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 4:36 a.m.

    Well, I am certainly glad that I bought Yahoo! stock.

    #93225

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 6:13 a.m.

    Annihilation of Yahoo

    annihilation - the state of being annihilated; extinction; destruction.

    What percent of duplication is there between Microsoft online properties and Yahoo? 80 percent.

    Eventual result of attempted merger is the destruction of nearly all that is Yahoo and a huge mess when Microsoft tries to force Yahoo users over to their services.

    For example, Microsoft attempts to force Yahoo Mail users over to Hotmail / Live and on and on with similar sitations such as trying to force Yahoo user logins to become Passport / Windows Live logins.

    The end result is that what is good and useful about Yahoo is destroyed and Microsoft gets little benefit and huge negatives from making a mess of the attempted integration of Yahoo.

    I deeply hope that this is blocked on anti-trust grounds.

    Confuciusiam at gamail

    #93241

    Posted by Heavily Caffeinated at 2/1/08 6:48 a.m.

    When asked about Microsoft's long-term search strategy, Ballmer, sweaty and red-faced, replied: "Once we buy up all the competition we'll be number one!!!"

    #93247

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 7:08 a.m.

    Let's hope and pray that Microsoft "kills off" MSN Adcenter and consolidates its effort under Yahoo Search. Hopefully, it is now completely obvious how ill conceived and poorly executed it has been. Yahoo! for Microsoft making this move. :-)

    #93257

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 7:25 a.m.

    Can someone please translate KJ's blathering? "integration principles", "land the specifics", "line of site" (sight), "value creation", "unlock"? Sounds like buzzword Bingo.

    Microsoft is full of middle managers just like this. They talk a lot and say nothing. If I was a shareholder or an employee, the growing ranks of Buzzword Bingo winners would concern me far more than being behind in Internet advertising, operating system innovation, developer excitement, digital media, and just about every core business. Or, more to the point, it's perhaps because of these clueless, self-perpetuating bureaucrats that they're behind in all of these markets.

    #93266

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 7:38 a.m.

    "Or, more to the point, it's perhaps because of these clueless, self-perpetuating bureaucrats that they're behind in all of these markets."

    Bingo - I work in Microsoft's online division and the company is packed with these people. Political and ineffective + they keep any innovative idea from making it out the door. They do have one skill they are awesome at though - survival.

    So don't count on Microsoft cutting their jobs.
    their jobs.

    #93277

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 8:13 a.m.

    Let's see - one company that fails to compete against Google + another company that fails to compete against Google = a larger company that can compete against Google.

    I would love to see who did that math.

    #93281

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 8:19 a.m.

    Just wondering how MSFT plans to integrate Yahoo's data center which I believe is almost entirely based on Open Source? Rip and replace with Windows server would take a long time, but the investors will expect quick returns on a $45B investment.
    Also, if you are a Yahoo techie who has spent your entire career working on Linux,Apache et al, would you stay around to work on Windows?

    #93286

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 8:27 a.m.

    I really hope the deal doesn't go through. Microsoft has a way of ruining everything it touches. They're going the way of the buffalo. Let's move on...without them.

    #93288

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 8:29 a.m.

    It's a good defensive play. If Yahoo! goes under then who gets their customers and add revenue - MS or Google?

    It's also a fair offensive play for reasons discussed

    #93318

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 9:23 a.m.

    They'll get $60 billion before they finish negotiating...buy more Yahoo stock!

    #93344

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 10:01 a.m.

    This acquisition only happened because Microsoft continues to promote middle managers without leadership skills in favor of middle managers who play the game more effectively. This, as a manager told me when I handed in my resignation, is "the new Kevin Johnson Microsoft." I'm horrified at what happened to the company I loved and loved working at so much. As a shareholder, I'm outraged. As a former employee, I'm sad.

    #93346

    Posted by BeenHereAWhile at 2/1/08 10:02 a.m.

    Let's see - one company that fails to compete against Google + another company that fails to compete against Google = a larger company that can compete against Google.

    I think it's even worse than that. Any of the divisions at both of these companies that are actually successful at doing something are going to be so embroiled in the mess or totally neglected that they start failing too.

    What an incredible boondoggle. I always knew Microsoft would end up destroying itself given enough time (Vista was a good start). It looks like they're just speeding up the process.

    #93347

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 10:03 a.m.

    I wouldn't worry about the data center too much. Microsoft won't attempt to move it to Windows wholesale. Over time, new components or services could be Windows. But no one is dumb enough to port an entire legacy codebase for dogmatic reasons.

    Right?

    #93349

    Posted by Marcelo at 2/1/08 10:08 a.m.

    Google days are over, thank God!!!

    #93353

    Posted by frustrated at 2/1/08 10:14 a.m.

    Combining MSN ad sales and Yahoo ad sales would actually be pretty easy because MSN has so little traction with advertisers. THey just need to combine the Aquantive people and Yahoo which could be a very powerful combination.

    The antitrust issues will be tricky to work through. MIcrosoft and Yahoo had each bought ad network companies to compete against Google buying Doubleclick. That grand combination could be too much for regulators to swallow, there would be two major networks which could significantly harm competition and increase prices for ads.

    #93357

    Posted by LoveYourViaduct at 2/1/08 10:20 a.m.

    +++ Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 4:36 a.m.

    Well, I am certainly glad that I bought Yahoo! stock.

    Hmmm, depending on whether the deal actually goes through, this might be a good time to sell. Part of your payment would be MS stock, which hasn't exactly been a barnburner itself lately. Just a thought.

    #93358

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 10:22 a.m.

    MS has to worry about the data center. I can imagine Microsoft's embarassment at the constant sniping from Linux advocates that they are running open source. Do you remeber the uproar a few years ago when people realized that (initially) hotmail was running on Open Source? MS changed that as quick as they could. I don't think they have that luxury though in trying to digest something as big as Yahoo.

    #93361

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 10:29 a.m.

    Yahoo is a public reference for both MySQL (now Sun) and Documentum (on Linux), in addition to a whole bunch of proprietary open-source code.

    MR BALLMER & MR JOHNSON, I *DARE* YOU TO PUBLICLY MIGRATE YAHOO TO WINDOWS, SQL SERVER, AND OH YEA ... SHAREPOINT.

    There. That outta do it. Now I'm going to go buy some Sun stock.

    #93393

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 11:26 a.m.

    "Now I'm going to go buy some Sun stock."

    You might be better off throwing money into a burning fireplace.

    #93450

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 1:08 p.m.

    regardless what ms may want to do with yahoo, it's time to clean out the useless middle management in both companies. how could yahoo lose out to google in the first place? yahoo was there way before google. why does ms lag so far behind despite all the cash it has in the bank? Lack of innovation! Why? B.S. speaking managers like K.Johnson

    #93452

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 1:13 p.m.

    Geocities and Yahoo Groups will finally have a nice home... yes!

    #93469

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 1:46 p.m.

    Both of these companies have major issues in competing against Google in the primary revenue driver in this category, paid search listings. Panama has not delivered and is underwhelming to say the least. Adcenter has been horrific from an executional standpoint and entirely limited in volume. I agree with other posters, two wrongs don't make a right.

    The interesting thing here is that Microsoft has had a major role in putting Yahoo in this situation. When Microsoft decided to go their own and dump Overture (then owned by Yahoo) as their paid search provider and go it on their own, it put Yahoo in a major financial bind. They struggled mightily to replace that traffic and made some less than ideal business deals with shady traffic providers. This sullied their reputation and the effectiveness of the system and just sent more ad dollars to Google.

    Meanwhile, MSN struggles to come up with their own search platform, Adcenter, and has fallen well behind expectations and alienated customers left and right. More ad dollars to Google. See the pattern here?

    So, in that respect I could see a combined MSN/Yahoo product gaining. Enhancing Yahoo's Panama product with quality traffic from MSN.

    #93505

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 2:44 p.m.

    if you think ms will spend years replacing yahoo's infrastructure with windows, think again. shareholders ain't that patient!

    I just can't see how time and effort required to microsoftize yahoo technically will be ok'd by the board -- it'll take years to do that. there are much bigger problems to solve in this space than winning the platform war (i.e. ad revenues in china...)

    #93516

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 3:04 p.m.

    In some industries, when one company buys another, the only goal is to shut down a competitor. I am worried now about what will happen to all of Yahoo's nice services: email, webpage hosting…? Will Microsoft just shut them down, or continue them with their well-known low quality?

    :(

    www.dirkschweitzer.net/DNATests.html

    #93559

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 4:26 p.m.

    "...Google opened for business in September 1998. That means the dominant company in this space, the one that Microsoft and Yahoo and dozens of much older media companies are chasing, is still less than a decade old. Given that history, and the fact that the barriers to entry are ridiculously low -- no blast furnaces or giant assembly plants required -- maybe the long-term winner will not be Google or Microsoft or Yahoo but a company that isn't even in business yet." that's the best wisdom offered on this whole deal yet...

    #93565

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 4:38 p.m.

    Yahoo mail a nice service ? Geocities? Flickr was bought, remember?

    #93570

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/1/08 4:49 p.m.

    Google, please make an counter offer!!!!

    #93877

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/2/08 12:19 p.m.

    time to switch your email provider ppl ... if u use yahoo mail.
    if the deal goes through i for 1 am gonna switch my mail from yahoo to gmail.
    can u imagine the spam yahoo mail users will be killed with ... lol

    #94856

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/5/08 11:35 a.m.

    As a long term Hotmail employee I can tell you that the potential platform issues mentioned above are overstated. It took about 9 years to fully migrate the entire Hotmail service over to MS technologies, and there was little pressure from Redmond to accelerate the pace. Stability, consistent growth, and customer satisfaction were the primary tasks, with migration as a nice to have along the way. Indivdual components were moved to MS technologies only when end of life issues called for a rewrite, and not because of internal pressure to migrate.

    Meanwhile, the problems specific to running a mixed platform service were minimal since all of the inter component communication happens at the network protocol level and is not OS specific. Hotmail ran for years across multiple OS platforms and it was tightly integrated with other MS services running Windows such as Passport and Messenger.

    This can be done with Yahoo! services as well. Case in point is the current federation of the two IM services. This was accomplished as two separate companies, so why would it be any harder as a single company?

    This is not to say that there aren't ton of other issues with this proposed merger, but I would worry a lot less about the technology and migration issues. Both companies have plenty of engineering horsepower to solve those issues. I'd be more concerned about the management layers, culture clashes, and business decision making.

    #96833

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/10/08 8:03 a.m.

    Good, I cant wait for microsoft to sink and its even more fun they sink themselves! Google be praised! All ms stands for in my eyes are a crap bloated system which they attempt to force unto us, shitty business practices and
    no respect whatsoever for their customers and others in IT community.

    AXe!

    #101539

    Posted by unregistered user at 2/25/08 7:49 a.m.

    I think yahoo will refuse to microsoft,the world still needs more outstanding enterprises.

    http://needgoogle.cn/%e5%be%ae%e8%bd%af%e8%a6%81%e6%94%b6%e8%b4%adyahoo/

    ! Login below to post a comment.

    Registered users, log in here
    E-mail 
    Password 
    Remember me
     HELP! I forget my password

    Unregistered users, sign up now

    Or post anonymously (About this feature)

    Your comment (No HTML allowed, use these special codes instead)
    Violating our Terms of Service may result in your post being removed.

    Special codes
    • [b]selected text[/b] -- Display the selected text in bold.
    • [i]selected text[/i] -- Display the selected text in italics.
    • [link]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags.
    • [link title="Seattle Post-Intelligencer"]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags, uses title as link text.
    • [mail]newmedia@seattlepi.com[/mail] -- Creates a link to an email address.
    Enter the code shown:
    What is this?
    BLOGGER BIO
    photo
    Todd Bishop:
    P-I reporter
    CONTACT INFO

    Have a news tip or a comment? E-mail me or call directly, 206-448-8221.

    MSFT: DAILY TREND

    FEATURED COMMENT

    PictureI think taking a larger share of Facebook would be a good move. Facebook is preparing itself to be the platform of the web and this is exactly what MS needs. Also incorporating facebook services with outlook and hotmail could be extremely useful. Unfortunately, a complete buyout would put MS's name behind the service which could turn users away (as fickle as young people are) so, like the previous 250 million investment, it would need to be quiet."

    -- Wilker, on Poll: Whom should Microsoft pursue next?

    BALLMER MOOD INDEX

    Picture About this feature

    TOPIC: WINDOWS VISTA

    · Vista at One Year: Progress and Pain
    · Computer shop's sales pitch: 'We remove Vista'
    ·
    Full text: Microsoft execs on Vista problems
    · All stories and posts

    MICROSOFT KEYWORDS

    Our interactive timeline analyzes three decades of key documents to provide a scrolling snapshot of the issues at the center of Microsoft's consciousness across the years.

    ARCHIVES
    May 2008
    SMTWTFS
            123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
    Browse by month
    Browse by category

    Recent entries
    · Next up: A Microsoft-Google antitrust fight?
    · News Corp. says no MySpace-Microsoft talks
    · Poll: Whom should Microsoft pursue next?
    · Opinion: A Microsoft shareholder's manifesto
    · Excerpt: Warren Buffett, Bill Gates on Yahoo
    · Microsoft's new automotive deal: Hyundai-Kia
    · Microsoft adds NBC, other TV shows to Zune
    · Reports: Yahoo still 'open' to Microsoft talks

    Search this blog

    Older archives

    RSS/Web feeds (help)
    RSS 2.0RSS 1.0Atom
    Headlines for your site

    LINKS

    News and information
    · WinInfo
    · Microsoft Watch
    · Directions on Microsoft
    · WinInsider
    · ActiveWin
    · KOMO News: Microsoft
    · NetworkWorld: Microsoft
    · Google News: Microsoft
    · Yahoo News: Microsoft
    · Microsoft Research News
    · Microsoft PressPass
    · Channel 9
    · Anti-Microsoft News
    · NewsForge: Linux News
    · Linux Today
    · Mac News Network
    · Mac Daily News
    · Washington Post Filter
    · G.M. Silicon Valley
    · OS News
    · Gillmor Gang

    Blogs about Microsoft
    · Mary Jo Foley: All About Microsoft
    · LiveSide.net
    · Microsoft Monitor
    · Unofficial MSFT Blog
    · IW Windows Weblog
    · Xbox 2 Blog
    · Inside Microsoft
    · CNet Microsoft Blog
    · Bink.nu
    · Long Zheng, istartedsomething.com
    · Beyond Binary, Ina Fried of CNet News.com

    Computer Security
    · Microsoft Security
    · Wash. Post Security Fix
    · Microsoft Security Response Center Blog
    · Be Careful Out There
    · Security Awareness Blog
    · Bruce Schneier's Blog
    · eWeek Security News
    · Larry Seltzer
    · Symantec Security Resp.
    · McAfee Virus Information
    · CNet Security Blog
    · Security Focus
    · Kaspersky Lab Analyst's Weblog
    · Michael Howard (MSFT)
    · Stephen Toulouse (MSFT)
    · Network World Security
    · Planet Security

    Microsoft employees
    · Employee Blog Portal
    · MS Watch List
    · S. Somasegar
    · Raymond Chen
    · Dare Obasanjo
    · Brad Abrams
    · Heather Hamilton
    · Korby Parnell
    · Matt Goyer
    · Don Box
    · Chris Anderson
    · Joshua Allen
    · Chris Sells
    · John Porcaro
    · John Montgomery
    · Kevin Schofield
    · Rick Schaut
    · Marc Miller
    · Sean Alexander
    · Larry Hryb
    · Jobs Blog
    · Greg Roth
    · Harry Pierson
    · Mini-Microsoft

    Search-related sites
    · John Battelle
    · Greg Linden
    · Unofficial Google Blog
    · Yahoo! Search Blog
    · MSN Sandbox
    · MSN Search Weblog
    · Google Blog
    · Search Engine Lowdown
    · Search Engine Watch
    · Google Like a Hawk

    Browser-related sites
    · Internet Explorer team
    · mozillaZine
    · Surfin' Safari
    · Opera news
    · Browser News

    Technology Weblogs
    · Robert Scoble
    · Paul McNamara
    · Dwight Silverman
    · Charlene Li
    · Joel Spolsky
    · Engadget
    · Gizmodo
    · Corante Apple Blog
    · Amy Wohl
    · Dan Gillmor
    · Simon Phipps
    · Buzz Andersen
    · Chris Seper
    · Hiawatha Bray
    · Paul Andrews
    · Doc Searls
    · Chris Pirillo
    · Campbell & Swigart
    · Longhorn Blogs
    · PDC Bloggers

    Antitrust info
    · FindLaw: Microsoft
    · DOJ Microsoft site
    · Microsoft legal site
    · Findings of Fact
    · ComputerWorld Report
    · Sun legal page
    · Dan Kegel's antitrust site

    Additional sites
    · Google Microsoft Search
    · About Microsoft
    · Microsoft User Network
    · Tablet PC Buzz
    · Living Without Microsoft
    · Lockergnome
    · WSA
    · WashTech
    · CyberLodge
    · Microsoft Permatemps
    · Apache Foundation
    · Librenex
    · Electronic Frontier Foundation

    ADVERTISING

    Most recent posts
    · Seattle Shopper: spotlight on: MOMS, Maids, and More
    · Devouring sEATtle: Now, Bake These Macaroons
    · Take 2 Online: Weekly Wrap - May 5-11

    *Would you like to blog for us?

    Advertising

    Seattle Post-Intelligencer
    101 Elliott Ave. W.
    Seattle, WA 98119
    (206) 448-8000

    Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
    seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
    and 30 million page views each month.

    Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
    Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
    ©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
    Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

    Hearst Newspapers