![]() |
« Microsoft cites human error in anti-piracy malfunction | Main | 'Halo 3' is done »
Microsoft, hoping to grab the attention of corporate technology departments, is announcing this morning that it's releasing Windows Vista Service Pack 1 in preliminary form in the next few weeks, and in final form in the first quarter of next year. The company had previously been extraordinarily tight-lipped about the timing of Vista SP1, and its contents.
"We're really viewing it as not a feature delivery vehicle but a way to fix some existing issues and enhance a few features, some capabilities that are already in the OS," said David Zipkin, a Microsoft senior product manager, in a phone interview.
For example, Zipkin said, SP1 will address Windows Vista performance problems including sluggish copying and unzipping of files; slowness in resuming from hibernate and standby; and a delay that some users experience when hitting Control-Alt-Delete to log in. Microsoft is also trying to make Windows Vista more reliable, using error reporting data to determine the "highest-impact" issues, he said.
Among other things, the company says the service pack will include support for the exFAT file system, for mobile devices. SP1 will also expand BitLocker encryption to local hard drives other than the C drive. And it will include Windows Vista security patches and other updates issued since the operating system was released.
Psychologically, at least, the release of the first service pack for a new Windows version has traditionally been a key moment in Microsoft's efforts to get businesses to upgrade. Many wait until Service Pack 1 before moving ahead. Via phone, analyst Al Gillen, research vice president at IDC, explained the reasoning.
"It's a watershed event for a lot of customers," Gillen said. "Once upon a time that was a really important thing, because you didn't have things like the Windows Update service that we have today. So the patches and the fixes that you get on an ongoing basis were hard to come by, and generally speaking you got them in the form of a service pack. Now, today ... those patches tend to get to you a lot faster. So technically, the impact of a service pack is a lot less pervasive than it would have been a few years ago. But mentally, it's still an important milestone, I believe. For a lot of customers, they still wait to see a service pack because they feel that is the point in time where a Microsoft product has gotten to a level of testing or reliability where they have the confidence that the product is going to be stable enough for them to use."
Separately, Microsoft said this morning that it's releasing Service Pack 3 for Windows XP in preliminary form in the next few weeks and in final form in the first half of next year.
The company is also delaying Windows Server 2008's release to manufacturing to the first quarter of next year. Previously, Microsoft had been planning to release it by the end of this year. I'll have more on that news, and its implications, in a follow-up post.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Microsoft, you really need to start looking for revenue elsewhere. Resorting to bribing users to use your products and services is just plain embarrassing.
-- Reader on Microsoft offers 'perks' to search users
· Microsoft polishes Vista into Windows 7
· Microsoft details Windows 7 features
· Reviewers mostly applaud Windows 7
· All stories and posts
Recent entries
· Microsoft added 500 employees in November
· Microsoft: Xbox 360 outsold PS3 over weekend
· Video: BMW signs up for Microsoft's Surface
· College students still enamored of Apple brand
· Report: Five strategies Microsoft got right
Microsoft News
· Microsoft PressPass
· Directions on Microsoft
· WinInsider
· ActiveWin
· NetworkWorld: Microsoft
· Microsoft Research News
· Channel 9
· OS News
· Microsoft SEC filings
· WinInfo
· Microsoft Confidential
· Bink.nu
Microsoft Blogs
· Ed Bott
· Mary Jo Foley
· Ina Fried
· LiveSide
· Emil Protalinski
· Rafael Rivera Jr.
· Paul Thurrott
· Joe Wilcox
· Long Zheng
Microsoft Employees
· Employee Blog Portal
· S. Somasegar
· Raymond Chen
· Dare Obasanjo
· Brad Abrams
· Heather Hamilton
· Chris Anderson
· Joshua Allen
· Chris Sells
· John Porcaro
· John Montgomery
· Kevin Schofield
· Sean Alexander
· Jobs Blog
· Harry Pierson
· Mini-Microsoft
Technology Blogs
· Robert Scoble
· Paul McNamara
· Dwight Silverman
· Charlene Li
· Joel Spolsky
· Engadget
· Gizmodo
· Simon Phipps
· Paul Andrews
· Chris Pirillo
Search-related sites
· John Battelle
· Greg Linden
· Yahoo! Search Blog
· Live Search Blog
· Google Blog
· Search Engine Watch
· Google Like a Hawk
Browser-related sites
· Internet Explorer team
· mozillaZine
· Surfin' Safari
· Browser News
Antitrust info
· FindLaw: Microsoft
· DOJ Microsoft site
· Microsoft legal site
· Findings of Fact
· ComputerWorld Report
· Sun legal page
· Dan Kegel's antitrust site
· WTIA Security SIG: Cyber Attack of the Critical Infrastructure
all tech events
more
more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
©1996-2008 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by stabilizer at 8/30/07 2:31 p.m.
I am just your average joe that uses a computer and has a folder full of software that has served me well over the years that I have invested a fair amount of money in. I bought a new computer with Vista loaded on it only to find out almost none of my software will work with it. Now come on Mr. Gates haven't you enough money without making us buy all new software? I did not wish to play this game of making an all ready filthy rich man even richer. So I returned the computer got my money back and bought one with XP loaded on it. No fair Bill you know better this Vista could be your undoing. I am not the only one saying this, the computer store I ended up in was flooded with people doing exactly the same thing.