![]() |
« Vista: Released, not done | Main | Only if Dogbert runs the campaign »
Update, clarification: Current and past Microsoft Office versions, dating back to Office 2000 SR1, have a reduced functionality mode, as well. It is less forgiving this time around: While Office 2003 allowed users 50 "grace launches" without activation before shifting into reduced functionality mode, the 2007 Office programs will reduce the grace period to 25 launches.
The reduced functionality mode in the 2007 Office programs differs from Windows Vista by applying only to the initial retail product activation process. Windows Vista goes further by reducing functionality if the software doesn't pass an additional "validation" process. Not passing that extra validation step in Office prevents access to downloads and add-ons but doesn't reduce the software's basic functionality. I've changed the original post to reflect all of this:
Original post: Mary Jo Foley points to a Microsoft Office 2007 support document that describes how the productivity software will limit the functionality of copies that don't pass the company's activation process. It's part of Microsoft's broader effort to crack down on counterfeiting and illegal use of its software.
Although this doesn't make the program entirely unusable, it takes away key capabilities, prompting comparisons to a "kill switch." From the support page:
In reduced-functionality mode, programs function similarly to viewers. When a program runs in reduced-functionality mode, many commands are unavailable (dimmed). Therefore, you cannot access those functionalities. Some of the limitations of reduced-functionality mode include the following:You cannot create new documents. You can view existing documents. However, you cannot edit them. You can print documents. However, you cannot save them.
Some Linux vendors saw Microsoft's anti-piracy approach in Windows Vista as a potential boon for their business. It will be interesting to see if the spotlight on Microsoft's anti-piracy initiatives also causes more people to consider OpenOffice.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Have a news tip or a comment? E-mail me or call directly, 206-448-8221.
I think taking a larger share of Facebook would be a good move. Facebook is preparing itself to be the platform of the web and this is exactly what MS needs. Also incorporating facebook services with outlook and hotmail could be extremely useful. Unfortunately, a complete buyout would put MS's name behind the service which could turn users away (as fickle as young people are) so, like the previous 250 million investment, it would need to be quiet."
· Vista at One Year: Progress and Pain
· Computer shop's sales pitch: 'We remove Vista'
· Full text: Microsoft execs on Vista problems
· All stories and posts
Our interactive timeline analyzes three decades of key documents to provide a scrolling snapshot of the issues at the center of Microsoft's consciousness across the years.
| July 2008 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Recent entries
· Ex-Microsoft manager sentenced to 22 months
· Ex-Microsoft manager asks judge for leniency
· PS3 sales rise on Metal Gear Solid 4 demand
· Microsoft profits miss Wall Street estimates
· E3: The 'Halo' news that didn't happen?
· Report: Microsoft, Time Warner discuss AOL deal
· Sony confirms shift to single PS3 model
· E3: PlayStation video store will link to PSP
RSS/Web feeds (help)




News and information
· WinInfo
· Microsoft Watch
· Directions on Microsoft
· WinInsider
· ActiveWin
· KOMO News: Microsoft
· NetworkWorld: Microsoft
· Google News: Microsoft
· Yahoo News: Microsoft
· Microsoft Research News
· Microsoft PressPass
· Channel 9
· Anti-Microsoft News
· NewsForge: Linux News
· Linux Today
· Mac News Network
· Mac Daily News
· Washington Post Filter
· G.M. Silicon Valley
· OS News
· Gillmor Gang
Blogs about Microsoft
· Mary Jo Foley: All About Microsoft
· LiveSide.net
· Microsoft Monitor
· Unofficial MSFT Blog
· IW Windows Weblog
· Xbox 2 Blog
· Inside Microsoft
· CNet Microsoft Blog
· Bink.nu
· Long Zheng, istartedsomething.com
· Beyond Binary, Ina Fried of CNet News.com
Computer Security
· Microsoft Security
· Wash. Post Security Fix
· Microsoft Security Response Center Blog
· Be Careful Out There
· Security Awareness Blog
· Bruce Schneier's Blog
· eWeek Security News
· Larry Seltzer
· Symantec Security Resp.
· McAfee Virus Information
· CNet Security Blog
· Security Focus
· Kaspersky Lab Analyst's Weblog
· Michael Howard (MSFT)
· Stephen Toulouse (MSFT)
· Network World Security
· Planet Security
Microsoft employees
· Employee Blog Portal
· MS Watch List
· S. Somasegar
· Raymond Chen
· Dare Obasanjo
· Brad Abrams
· Heather Hamilton
· Korby Parnell
· Matt Goyer
· Don Box
· Chris Anderson
· Joshua Allen
· Chris Sells
· John Porcaro
· John Montgomery
· Kevin Schofield
· Rick Schaut
· Marc Miller
· Sean Alexander
· Larry Hryb
· Jobs Blog
· Greg Roth
· Harry Pierson
· Mini-Microsoft
Search-related sites
· John Battelle
· Greg Linden
· Unofficial Google Blog
· Yahoo! Search Blog
· MSN Sandbox
· MSN Search Weblog
· Google Blog
· Search Engine Lowdown
· Search Engine Watch
· Google Like a Hawk
Browser-related sites
· Internet Explorer team
· mozillaZine
· Surfin' Safari
· Opera news
· Browser News
Technology Weblogs
· Robert Scoble
· Paul McNamara
· Dwight Silverman
· Charlene Li
· Joel Spolsky
· Engadget
· Gizmodo
· Corante Apple Blog
· Amy Wohl
· Dan Gillmor
· Simon Phipps
· Buzz Andersen
· Chris Seper
· Hiawatha Bray
· Paul Andrews
· Doc Searls
· Chris Pirillo
· Campbell & Swigart
· Longhorn Blogs
· PDC Bloggers
Antitrust info
· FindLaw: Microsoft
· DOJ Microsoft site
· Microsoft legal site
· Findings of Fact
· ComputerWorld Report
· Sun legal page
· Dan Kegel's antitrust site
Additional sites
· Google Microsoft Search
· About Microsoft
· Microsoft User Network
· Tablet PC Buzz
· Living Without Microsoft
· Lockergnome
· WSA
· WashTech
· CyberLodge
· Microsoft Permatemps
· Apache Foundation
· Librenex
· Electronic Frontier Foundation
more
more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by unregistered user at 11/20/06 11:44 a.m.
I switched to OpenOffice back in January of 2006 after testing the product for a few weeks. I couldn't justify spending $100's on an updated MS Office suite when one was available for free.
I do see some limitations in the spreadsheet offered by OpenOffice, but this only applies to some 'hard-core' projects I do for work (financial analysis). For everything else, OpenOffice meets my needs.
Also, the developers keep improving OpenOffice while Microsoft is basically limited to making their product more "productive" (i.e. cosmetic changes). In other words, MS sets the standard, but can't seem to improve it much. Consequently, OpenOffice is fast catching up to MS. How long can it be before OpenOffice is just as functional as MS Office?
I don't have any reservations in recommending OpenOffice to anyone tired of paying MS for a product update that is basically cosmetic.