![]() |
« Brian Valentine going to Amazon.com | Main | Will Microsoft avoid more EU fines? »
Will Microsoft finish Windows Vista on schedule? That's one of the biggest questions facing the company these days. And the completion of the first Windows Vista release candidate last week creates a new opportunity to assess its chances, using historical comparisons to previous Windows timetables.
See this chart for timelines depicting the final stages of Windows 2000 and Windows XP development -- showing the number of days from Release Candidate 1 (RC1) to Release to Manufacturing (RTM) and then product launch. Below those, for comparison, is a third bar showing a hypothetical Windows Vista timeline, starting with last week's RC1. That timeline reflects Vista's scheduled November business release and January retail release, giving Microsoft maximum wiggle room by pegging the dates to the end of each month. It also assumes arbitrarily, for sake of comparison, that Microsoft would need to release Vista to manufacturing around the end of October to meet that schedule.
The chart shows that Microsoft was actually able to move Windows XP from RC1 to launch considerably faster than Windows Vista's retail release schedule would require. Based on that, it might be tempting to think that it will be easy for Microsoft to make the Vista release schedule, with time to spare.
However, there are some key differences with Windows Vista. For one, even though Vista's scheduled business launch stands to be less logistically complicated for Microsoft than a full retail rollout, a November launch would come no more than 90 days after the RC1 completion. That's a quick turnaround, compared with the timetables for the Windows XP and 2000 releases.
You could also argue, based on the amount of time and the magnitude of changes between releases, that it would be more appropriate to compare Windows Vista with Windows 2000. (In other words, the company's big upgrade from Windows XP to Windows Vista would be akin to the jump from Windows NT 4.0 to Windows 2000.) And while Windows 2000 was a unique situation, it's worth noting that the amount of time between its RC1 and release was especially long.
And there's another big difference this time around: At this point in the process of Windows XP's development, announcing the completion of XP RC1, Microsoft was precise about the final release date, saying publicly that it would be 115 days later, on Oct. 25, 2001. Windows XP ultimately met that schedule.
In contrast, the company's public statements about the Windows Vista schedule haven't been nearly as precise. Despite completing Windows Vista RC1 last week, Microsoft hasn't yet announced specific days in either November or January for Vista's business and retail releases. Of course, time will tell whether Windows Vista makes the current timetable. But in addition to the previous equivocation from the company's top executives, and the ongoing doubts expressed by analysts, the absence of specific public dates at this point indicates a considerably lower degree of confidence in the schedule this time around.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Have a news tip or a comment? E-mail me or call directly, 206-448-8221.
I think taking a larger share of Facebook would be a good move. Facebook is preparing itself to be the platform of the web and this is exactly what MS needs. Also incorporating facebook services with outlook and hotmail could be extremely useful. Unfortunately, a complete buyout would put MS's name behind the service which could turn users away (as fickle as young people are) so, like the previous 250 million investment, it would need to be quiet."
· Vista at One Year: Progress and Pain
· Computer shop's sales pitch: 'We remove Vista'
· Full text: Microsoft execs on Vista problems
· All stories and posts
Our interactive timeline analyzes three decades of key documents to provide a scrolling snapshot of the issues at the center of Microsoft's consciousness across the years.
| July 2008 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Recent entries
· Ex-Microsoft manager sentenced to 22 months
· Ex-Microsoft manager asks judge for leniency
· PS3 sales rise on Metal Gear Solid 4 demand
· Microsoft profits miss Wall Street estimates
· E3: The 'Halo' news that didn't happen?
· Report: Microsoft, Time Warner discuss AOL deal
· Sony confirms shift to single PS3 model
· E3: PlayStation video store will link to PSP
RSS/Web feeds (help)




News and information
· WinInfo
· Microsoft Watch
· Directions on Microsoft
· WinInsider
· ActiveWin
· KOMO News: Microsoft
· NetworkWorld: Microsoft
· Google News: Microsoft
· Yahoo News: Microsoft
· Microsoft Research News
· Microsoft PressPass
· Channel 9
· Anti-Microsoft News
· NewsForge: Linux News
· Linux Today
· Mac News Network
· Mac Daily News
· Washington Post Filter
· G.M. Silicon Valley
· OS News
· Gillmor Gang
Blogs about Microsoft
· Mary Jo Foley: All About Microsoft
· LiveSide.net
· Microsoft Monitor
· Unofficial MSFT Blog
· IW Windows Weblog
· Xbox 2 Blog
· Inside Microsoft
· CNet Microsoft Blog
· Bink.nu
· Long Zheng, istartedsomething.com
· Beyond Binary, Ina Fried of CNet News.com
Computer Security
· Microsoft Security
· Wash. Post Security Fix
· Microsoft Security Response Center Blog
· Be Careful Out There
· Security Awareness Blog
· Bruce Schneier's Blog
· eWeek Security News
· Larry Seltzer
· Symantec Security Resp.
· McAfee Virus Information
· CNet Security Blog
· Security Focus
· Kaspersky Lab Analyst's Weblog
· Michael Howard (MSFT)
· Stephen Toulouse (MSFT)
· Network World Security
· Planet Security
Microsoft employees
· Employee Blog Portal
· MS Watch List
· S. Somasegar
· Raymond Chen
· Dare Obasanjo
· Brad Abrams
· Heather Hamilton
· Korby Parnell
· Matt Goyer
· Don Box
· Chris Anderson
· Joshua Allen
· Chris Sells
· John Porcaro
· John Montgomery
· Kevin Schofield
· Rick Schaut
· Marc Miller
· Sean Alexander
· Larry Hryb
· Jobs Blog
· Greg Roth
· Harry Pierson
· Mini-Microsoft
Search-related sites
· John Battelle
· Greg Linden
· Unofficial Google Blog
· Yahoo! Search Blog
· MSN Sandbox
· MSN Search Weblog
· Google Blog
· Search Engine Lowdown
· Search Engine Watch
· Google Like a Hawk
Browser-related sites
· Internet Explorer team
· mozillaZine
· Surfin' Safari
· Opera news
· Browser News
Technology Weblogs
· Robert Scoble
· Paul McNamara
· Dwight Silverman
· Charlene Li
· Joel Spolsky
· Engadget
· Gizmodo
· Corante Apple Blog
· Amy Wohl
· Dan Gillmor
· Simon Phipps
· Buzz Andersen
· Chris Seper
· Hiawatha Bray
· Paul Andrews
· Doc Searls
· Chris Pirillo
· Campbell & Swigart
· Longhorn Blogs
· PDC Bloggers
Antitrust info
· FindLaw: Microsoft
· DOJ Microsoft site
· Microsoft legal site
· Findings of Fact
· ComputerWorld Report
· Sun legal page
· Dan Kegel's antitrust site
Additional sites
· Google Microsoft Search
· About Microsoft
· Microsoft User Network
· Tablet PC Buzz
· Living Without Microsoft
· Lockergnome
· WSA
· WashTech
· CyberLodge
· Microsoft Permatemps
· Apache Foundation
· Librenex
· Electronic Frontier Foundation
more
more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by unregistered user at 9/6/06 11:43 a.m.
Windows XP is built on the Windows 2000 kernel, so one would expect it to be released relatively quickly (a lot of the work was already finished). I don't think it would be valid to compare Vista with XP. Vista with 2000 is definitely a better comparison.