Skip ads and navigation
Advertising
Our network sites seattlepi.comHelp
Print thisE-mail this
What Windows 2000 and XP say about Vista's schedule

Will Microsoft finish Windows Vista on schedule? That's one of the biggest questions facing the company these days. And the completion of the first Windows Vista release candidate last week creates a new opportunity to assess its chances, using historical comparisons to previous Windows timetables.

Picture

Click for large chart. Sources of historical dates: ActiveWin; and Microsoft 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

See this chart for timelines depicting the final stages of Windows 2000 and Windows XP development -- showing the number of days from Release Candidate 1 (RC1) to Release to Manufacturing (RTM) and then product launch. Below those, for comparison, is a third bar showing a hypothetical Windows Vista timeline, starting with last week's RC1. That timeline reflects Vista's scheduled November business release and January retail release, giving Microsoft maximum wiggle room by pegging the dates to the end of each month. It also assumes arbitrarily, for sake of comparison, that Microsoft would need to release Vista to manufacturing around the end of October to meet that schedule.

The chart shows that Microsoft was actually able to move Windows XP from RC1 to launch considerably faster than Windows Vista's retail release schedule would require. Based on that, it might be tempting to think that it will be easy for Microsoft to make the Vista release schedule, with time to spare.

However, there are some key differences with Windows Vista. For one, even though Vista's scheduled business launch stands to be less logistically complicated for Microsoft than a full retail rollout, a November launch would come no more than 90 days after the RC1 completion. That's a quick turnaround, compared with the timetables for the Windows XP and 2000 releases.

You could also argue, based on the amount of time and the magnitude of changes between releases, that it would be more appropriate to compare Windows Vista with Windows 2000. (In other words, the company's big upgrade from Windows XP to Windows Vista would be akin to the jump from Windows NT 4.0 to Windows 2000.) And while Windows 2000 was a unique situation, it's worth noting that the amount of time between its RC1 and release was especially long.

And there's another big difference this time around: At this point in the process of Windows XP's development, announcing the completion of XP RC1, Microsoft was precise about the final release date, saying publicly that it would be 115 days later, on Oct. 25, 2001. Windows XP ultimately met that schedule.

In contrast, the company's public statements about the Windows Vista schedule haven't been nearly as precise. Despite completing Windows Vista RC1 last week, Microsoft hasn't yet announced specific days in either November or January for Vista's business and retail releases. Of course, time will tell whether Windows Vista makes the current timetable. But in addition to the previous equivocation from the company's top executives, and the ongoing doubts expressed by analysts, the absence of specific public dates at this point indicates a considerably lower degree of confidence in the schedule this time around.

Posted by at September 6, 2006 9:22 a.m.
Category:
Comments
#12114

Posted by unregistered user at 9/6/06 11:43 a.m.

Windows XP is built on the Windows 2000 kernel, so one would expect it to be released relatively quickly (a lot of the work was already finished). I don't think it would be valid to compare Vista with XP. Vista with 2000 is definitely a better comparison.

#12121

Posted by unregistered user at 9/6/06 1:06 p.m.

agreed.
XP was a tiny upgrade really, mostly cosmetic.
NT4-2000 was much bigger.

On the other hand, some of the really big upgrades Vistas was going to get are now pushed to the next,next version of Windows :-/
Microsoft appearently cant just wait till its all ready for one big jump upgrade, they need our money now, and then again 1-2 years later.

#12128

Posted by unregistered user at 9/6/06 1:40 p.m.

2000 to XP is almost a purely cosmetic change, akin to adding a plus pack.

Vista is a COLLOSSAL change from XP. The transition from Windows 3.1 to Windows 95 would be a better comparison.

#12235

Posted by unregistered user at 9/8/06 9:44 a.m.

Microsoft admitted they had changed the meaning of Release Candidate for Vista, claiming it had evolved. This means there can be no comparison between previous versions and Vista. The current "release candidate" has numerous bugs and should be considered a beta is the strict sense of the term.

#12265

Posted by unregistered user at 9/8/06 7:49 p.m.

Windows Vista really is not ready for release. As an ex-Microsoft employee this smacks of a time based release (similar to the SMS debacle about 5 years ago). What has possessed Microsoft to release this on the BUsiness community in the first instance. CRAZY! They will be in BIG troubles.

#12676

Posted by unregistered user at 9/16/06 2:31 a.m.

Microsoft has historically been late with releases. Vista, the ex"Longhorn" super os has almost become MS's version of Apple's failed pre OS X "Copland" OS. Vista is still very late and many features have been cut out of the original concept. The good thing about this memory hog is that by the time it does come out, Intel type Duo Core chips will be a mainstream standard and will probably be able to run this overcoded monstrosity.

This pc user is sticking with the tried and true till Vista gets its act completely together. Then there are of course, the Intel Macs...

#64063

Posted by unregistered user at 11/7/07 10:10 a.m.

Barbie oyunları
giydirme oyunları
sue oyunları
giysi oyunları

! Login below to post a comment.

Registered users, log in here
E-mail 
Password 
Remember me
 HELP! I forget my password

Unregistered users, sign up now

Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Your comment (No HTML allowed, use these special codes instead)
Violating our Terms of Service may result in your post being removed.

Special codes
  • [b]selected text[/b] -- Display the selected text in bold.
  • [i]selected text[/i] -- Display the selected text in italics.
  • [link]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags.
  • [link title="Seattle Post-Intelligencer"]www.seattlepi.com[/link] -- Creates a link to the url between the link tags, uses title as link text.
  • [mail]newmedia@seattlepi.com[/mail] -- Creates a link to an email address.
Enter the code shown:
What is this?
BLOGGER BIO
photo
Todd Bishop:
P-I reporter
CONTACT INFO

Have a news tip or a comment? E-mail me or call directly, 206-448-8221.

MSFT: DAILY TREND

FEATURED COMMENT

PictureI think taking a larger share of Facebook would be a good move. Facebook is preparing itself to be the platform of the web and this is exactly what MS needs. Also incorporating facebook services with outlook and hotmail could be extremely useful. Unfortunately, a complete buyout would put MS's name behind the service which could turn users away (as fickle as young people are) so, like the previous 250 million investment, it would need to be quiet."

-- Wilker, on Poll: Whom should Microsoft pursue next?

BALLMER MOOD INDEX

Picture About this feature

TOPIC: WINDOWS VISTA

· Vista at One Year: Progress and Pain
· Computer shop's sales pitch: 'We remove Vista'
·
Full text: Microsoft execs on Vista problems
· All stories and posts

MICROSOFT KEYWORDS

Our interactive timeline analyzes three decades of key documents to provide a scrolling snapshot of the issues at the center of Microsoft's consciousness across the years.

ARCHIVES
July 2008
SMTWTFS
    12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031   
Browse by month
Browse by category

Recent entries
· Ex-Microsoft manager sentenced to 22 months
· Ex-Microsoft manager asks judge for leniency
· PS3 sales rise on Metal Gear Solid 4 demand
· Microsoft profits miss Wall Street estimates
· E3: The 'Halo' news that didn't happen?
· Report: Microsoft, Time Warner discuss AOL deal
· Sony confirms shift to single PS3 model
· E3: PlayStation video store will link to PSP

Search this blog

Older archives

RSS/Web feeds (help)
RSS 2.0RSS 1.0Atom
Headlines for your site

LINKS

News and information
· WinInfo
· Microsoft Watch
· Directions on Microsoft
· WinInsider
· ActiveWin
· KOMO News: Microsoft
· NetworkWorld: Microsoft
· Google News: Microsoft
· Yahoo News: Microsoft
· Microsoft Research News
· Microsoft PressPass
· Channel 9
· Anti-Microsoft News
· NewsForge: Linux News
· Linux Today
· Mac News Network
· Mac Daily News
· Washington Post Filter
· G.M. Silicon Valley
· OS News
· Gillmor Gang

Blogs about Microsoft
· Mary Jo Foley: All About Microsoft
· LiveSide.net
· Microsoft Monitor
· Unofficial MSFT Blog
· IW Windows Weblog
· Xbox 2 Blog
· Inside Microsoft
· CNet Microsoft Blog
· Bink.nu
· Long Zheng, istartedsomething.com
· Beyond Binary, Ina Fried of CNet News.com

Computer Security
· Microsoft Security
· Wash. Post Security Fix
· Microsoft Security Response Center Blog
· Be Careful Out There
· Security Awareness Blog
· Bruce Schneier's Blog
· eWeek Security News
· Larry Seltzer
· Symantec Security Resp.
· McAfee Virus Information
· CNet Security Blog
· Security Focus
· Kaspersky Lab Analyst's Weblog
· Michael Howard (MSFT)
· Stephen Toulouse (MSFT)
· Network World Security
· Planet Security

Microsoft employees
· Employee Blog Portal
· MS Watch List
· S. Somasegar
· Raymond Chen
· Dare Obasanjo
· Brad Abrams
· Heather Hamilton
· Korby Parnell
· Matt Goyer
· Don Box
· Chris Anderson
· Joshua Allen
· Chris Sells
· John Porcaro
· John Montgomery
· Kevin Schofield
· Rick Schaut
· Marc Miller
· Sean Alexander
· Larry Hryb
· Jobs Blog
· Greg Roth
· Harry Pierson
· Mini-Microsoft

Search-related sites
· John Battelle
· Greg Linden
· Unofficial Google Blog
· Yahoo! Search Blog
· MSN Sandbox
· MSN Search Weblog
· Google Blog
· Search Engine Lowdown
· Search Engine Watch
· Google Like a Hawk

Browser-related sites
· Internet Explorer team
· mozillaZine
· Surfin' Safari
· Opera news
· Browser News

Technology Weblogs
· Robert Scoble
· Paul McNamara
· Dwight Silverman
· Charlene Li
· Joel Spolsky
· Engadget
· Gizmodo
· Corante Apple Blog
· Amy Wohl
· Dan Gillmor
· Simon Phipps
· Buzz Andersen
· Chris Seper
· Hiawatha Bray
· Paul Andrews
· Doc Searls
· Chris Pirillo
· Campbell & Swigart
· Longhorn Blogs
· PDC Bloggers

Antitrust info
· FindLaw: Microsoft
· DOJ Microsoft site
· Microsoft legal site
· Findings of Fact
· ComputerWorld Report
· Sun legal page
· Dan Kegel's antitrust site

Additional sites
· Google Microsoft Search
· About Microsoft
· Microsoft User Network
· Tablet PC Buzz
· Living Without Microsoft
· Lockergnome
· WSA
· WashTech
· CyberLodge
· Microsoft Permatemps
· Apache Foundation
· Librenex
· Electronic Frontier Foundation

ADVERTISING

Most recent posts
· Devouring sEATtle: Reasons to visit Bite of Seattle Sunday
· Living Simply: Saturday Market
· Back Beat: Upcoming Shows

*Would you like to blog for us?

Advertising

Seattle Post-Intelligencer
101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000

Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.

Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Hearst Newspapers