![]() |
« Rice shortage? U.S. paid millions to farmers to not plant it | Main | Who got a slice of the $1 billion timber pie? »
Say it isn't so. The New York Times had this story about the potential health risk posed by hybrid vehicles and the magnetic field created by their battery systems.
Here's the science:
The flow of electrical current to the motor that moves a hybrid vehicle at low speeds (and assists the gasoline engine on the highway) produces magnetic fields, which some studies have associated with serious health matters, including a possible risk of leukemia among children.
With the batteries and power cables in hybrids often placed close to the driver and passengers, some exposure to electromagnetic fields is unavoidable. Moreover, the exposure will be prolonged -- unlike, say, using a hair dryer or electric shaver -- for drivers who spend hours each day at the wheel.
As the primary driver of a hybrid Toyota Camry, this idea is a little troubling. I had to read on.
Reporter Jim Motavalli talked to those making up a small group of "skeptics" who are worried about the exposures, including a woman who thought her hybrid was causing her to fall asleep at the wheel.
There are also interviews with car manufacturers who said that their vehicles generated low levels of magnetism, below European standards for safe exposures.
My bottom-line conclusion? It's an interesting topic that I'll keep an eye out for, but I'm too worn down by readers and enviros worried over bisphenol A in Nalgene bottles, phthalates in plastic shower curtains and polluted fish to figure out some lead-lined seat cushion on which to park my bum. At this point, I'll take my chances.
For those wanting to test their own exposure, you can buy a TriField meter, which costs about $145, though there are questions about how accurately the average car owner is able to make a measurement.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)


| September 2008 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
Recent entries
· McCain mum on environment, climate change
· Go see salmon in Seattle
· Answer to energy needs: "Drill, baby, drill!"
· Federal scientists find risk in bisphenol A
· Flame retardants higher in kids than adults
· Seattle neighbors lose fight for Waldo Woods
· Toxics in Puget Sound marine life
· Puget Sound champ Bill Ruckelshaus for Obama
RSS/Web feeds (help)




News sources
· Sightline Institute (formerly Northwest Environment Watch)
· Environmental Health News
· Grist Magazine
· Society of Environmental Journalists
Quick resources
· Report an oil spill
· Where to dump hazardous waste
· Mercury in fish warnings
· How clean is the air
· There's a cougar in my backyard
· Report illegal tree cutting
· What to do with an old computer
Climate change
· Washington Climate Advisory Team
· UW Climate Impacts Group
· Climate Solutions
· Transportation Choices Coalition
Groups - Watery
· People For Puget Sound
· Puget Soundkeeper Alliance
· American Rivers
· Trout Unlimited
· Center for Whale Research
· Puget Sound Partnership
· Wild Fish Conservancy Northwest
· Save Our Wild Salmon
Groups - Turf
· Cascade Land Conservancy
· Trust for Public Land
· The Mountaineers
· PlantAmnesty
· Seattle Urban Nature Project
· Conservation Northwest
· The Nature Conservancy, Wash.
· Futurewise
· National Parks Conservation Association
Groups - Critters
· Center for Biological Diversity
· Defenders of Wildlife
· Audubon Washington
· Seattle Audubon Society
Groups - Poisonous
· Washington Toxics Coalition
· Heart of American Northwest (Hanford)
· Government Accountability Project (Hanford)
· Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility
· Environmental Working Group
Grab Bag
· Washington Environmental Council
· Environment Washington (formerly WashPIRG)
· EarthJustice
· Sierra Club, Cascades
· Sustainable Ballard

Dateline Earth
Reader blog: Energy: Strategies, Policy & Best Practices
Reader blog: Building Seattle Green
Reader blog: Green Human
Reader blog: Living Simply
more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by Green Party at 4/28/08 7:09 p.m.
Well, this is just silly. An extension of the fear-based culture we have developed over the past seven years. There is very little magnetic field from the cables, which are on the outside of the car's unibody chassis metal.
It is reasonable though to be concerned about chemicals leaching from plastics. Some are frightened that the using-up of oil will have other effects like reducing feedstock to make plastics, but they do not realize that other materials can be used to make very nice plastics... and do not leach hazardous chemicals that petroleum-based plastics have.