 |
· Want to blog for the P-I?
« Game News for January 17 08 | Main | Confidential Xbox 360 "Red Ring of Death" Source Responds »
The Xbox 360 "Red Ring of Death"
This past week I met and interviewed an individual who has worked on the Xbox 360 project for many years and they had some things that they wanted to get out into the public. I have the fullest confidence in the integrity of this confidential source. While respecting and protecting their rights we were able to have an in-depth interview of working in the Xbox project and just how things progressed to this point. Just keep in mind that a while back I broke the story that Bungie was leaving Microsoft and had all the details a full week before the official PR announcement Once again I have a confidential source from inside Redmond and I't all checks out to me.
Now on to the Interview:
Q: So what do you think the real failure rate of the Xbox 360 is? Some have estimated it as high as 30%. I got my Xbox in early 2007 and so far so good but what do you think the chance is that it's going to die on me one day.
It's around 30%, and all will probably fail early. This quarter they are expecting 1 M failures, most of those Xenons. Some of those are repeat failures. Life expectancy is all over the map because the design has very little margin for most of the important parameters. That means it's not a fault tolerant design. So a good unit may last a couple of years, while a bad unit can fail in hours. I have a launch unit and have not had a single problem with it. And it's used a lot. But I don't know anyone else with a 360 that hasn't broken, except you now. There's no way to tell when yours might die. But the cooler you can keep it, the longer it will probably last. So stand it up, keep it in free air, etc. :Note : Xenon was the code name for the first Xbox 360 mother board.
Q: Of all five videogame systems on the market now (PS3, PSP, PS2, DS, Wii and 360)only the Xbox 360 has had such major hardware failure problems. Microsoft being the only company based in the US making a videogame system. What part of Microsoft's way of doing things do you think caused this situation to happen.
First, MS has under resourced that product unit in all engineering areas since the very beginning. Especially in engineering support functions like test, quality, manufacturing, and supplier management. There just weren't enough people to do the job that needed to be done. The leadership in many of those areas was also lopsided in essential skills and experience. But I hear they are really trying to staff up now based on what has happened, and how cheap staff is compared to a couple of billion in cost of quality.
Second, MS was so focused on beating Sony this cycle that the 360 was rushed to market when all indications were that it had serious flaws. The design qual testing was insufficient and incomplete when the product was released to production. The manufacturing test equipment had major gaps in test coverage and wasn't reliable or repeatable. Manufacturing processes at eall levels of suppliers were immature and not in control. Initial end to end yields were in the mid 30%. Low yields always indicate serious design and manufacturing defects. Management chose to continue to ship anyways, and keep the lines running while trying to solve problems and bring the yields up. Whenever something failed and there was a question about whether the test result was false, they would remove that test, retest and ship, or see if the unit would boot a game and run briefly and then ship. 360 is too complex of a machine to get away with that.
In the end I think it was fear of failure, ambition to beat Sony, and the arrogance that they could figure anything out, that led to the decision to keep shipping. That management team had made some pretty bad decisions in the past and had never had to pay a proportional consequence. I'm sure they thought that somehow they would figure it out and everything would end up ok. Plus, they tend to make big decisions like that in terms of dollars. They would rationalize that if the first few million boxes had a high failure rate, a few 10's of millions of dollars would cover it. And contrasting that cost with a big lead on Sony, would pay it in a heartbeat. They weren't even thinking about Nintendo.
Compare that to Sony, who delayed their launch, even though they were behind, when their box wasn't ready.
Q: In your opinion what do you think the main cause of the Red Ring of Death failures have been?
RROD is caused by anything that fails in the "digital backbone" on the mother board. Also known as a core digital error. CPU, GPU, memory, etc. Bad parts, incompatible parts (timing problems) bad manufacturing process (like solder joints), misapplied heat sinks or thermal interface material, missing parts, broken parts, parts of the wrong value, missed test coverage. Any one or more, on any chip, or many other discrete components, would cause this. And many of the failures were obviously infant mortality, where they work when they leave the factory and fail early in use. The main design flaw was the excessive heat on the GPU warping the mother board around it. This would stress the solder joints on the GPU and any bad joints would then fail in early life.
There are also other significantly high failure rates in other areas, like the DVD.
Q: Does some games more than others cause hardware failure. Gears of War and Dead Rising were thought to be system killers when they came out.
Of course. Infant mortality, which is a weakened mechanical "thing" like a solder joint with a void in it, are exercised to failure by cyclic stress. The number of cycles and the amplitude of temperature change from low to high determine how quickly it will fail. Certain games will consume more bandwidth on the GPU, which has the most substandard thermal solution on the mother board, making it a lot hotter, warping the mobo and flexing the solder joints. Weak joints fail quickly. The better the game, the more often it will be played, again accelerating failures.
Q: Let's go over some of the rumored reasons RROD. Could you tell how close each theory is?
Over heating CPU/GPU due to the lead free solder?
They don't overheat due to PB Free. They over heat due to too much power dissipated in too small of an area, w/o a sufficient thermal management design to take the heat away from the junction of the transistors on the chips, the packages themselves, and the mobo. And the over heating is on the GPU. When the CPU heatsink is applied right, it does not over heat.
Defective parts due to overseas subcontractors?
Some defective parts, like BGAs where the solder balls are not of sufficient and uniform size, so they don't solder down evenly, or the substrate is warped, causing some joints to have insufficient solder. Bad chips from marginal or under tested wafers. Others are deficient processes, like misaligning the solder paste to the circuit board, or same on the parts, or not having the thermal profile right in the reflow oven during soldering. Manufacturers new to PB free tend to err on the low temp side thinking they are saving the parts reliability wise from a large thermal load. What they are really doing is not reflowing the PB free solder enough to make a good joint. PB free solder is non eutectic, which means the different metals in the solder alloy melt at different temperatures, unlike leaded solder where everything melts at the same temperature. If you under heat it, it won't bond well to the board or parts, won't form a good joint, leaving voids and other defects in the joints that lead to early failure under normal circumstances. But when you add the extraordinary heat and mother board warpage that goes with it, well you get a catastrophic failure rate like we've all seen on 360.
Defective or insufficient heat sinks?
A heat sink like the one they eventually put on the GPU would have helped a lot, since it stops the GPU heat from warping the mobo and breaking the solder joints. The CPU heatsink was fine. I've heard the memory was running hot too, and contributing to these failures. Not sure if they were heated by contact with the GPU heatsink, proximity on the mother board, or both. But with the new GPU heatsink the failure rate probably would have still been double digits overall. Way too high still.
Corrupt BIOS or OS bricking the system?
Maybe. But haven't heard of this outside of the periodic dash updates bricking boxes.
Is humidity a factor? Are Xbox 360s in Florida just as likely as a 360 in Seattle?
Humidity is a co-factor with temperature for many failure modes. The hotter the room ambient conditions, the more likely a 360 is to fail, all else being equal. Same for humidity.
Is keeping the 360 horizontal more safe than keeping it vertical?
I don't think so. Vertical exposes more surface area and volume to heat exchange with cooler room air. And I think opens more vent holes. Just don't let it fall over.
System wide design problems due to a production schedule that shipped a full year before the competition's systems?
Yes. It just wasn't mature enough. Too many design defects, lack of design margins, immature test processes and equipment, insufficient PB free manufacturing expertise at partner manufacturers who made the mother board.
Or is there no one specific problem but a bunch of possible problem for each console?
Yes. See above.
Q: How have IBM and ATI dealt with the Xbox 360 problems?
Sorry, I don't know. But they were contracted to design and help launch the chips. After that, MS owned the design and tooling. So they didn't have to worry about it. Although I'm sure they were pulled in.
Q: Just what is up with the RROD "Towel Trick" fix?
My best guess is that it somewhat reflows the solder joints on the GPU while it's under a high compressive load from the heatsink clip, causing any open solder joints to make contact again. I don't think it's going to fully reflow them because 1) PB free solder melts above 300 degrees C, and if that happened the GPU would be pulled flat to the mother board with a big puddle of solder under it shorting everything out.
Q: One of the problems that I have run into my 360 is that the disk tray will fail to eject and not let me swap disks. Have any ideas?
LOL. Reboot and try it again! Sorry, couldn't help myself. You didn't give me enough info. How often does it happen? Notice any conditions that tend to make it happen more repeatably (after long play, unit standing up, right after a previous eject, etc.)? Can you recover and get the tray open at some other time after it fails? What did you have to do? It might be as simple as a bad connection somewhere in the circuit for the eject button. Usually I'd recommend percussive maintenance (hit it) but that would probably damage the disc and could damage the console. So don't. Maybe the disc is jammed in there. Does the tray try to come out and then stop? Maybe there is a misalignment with the box case. See if you can find a place where it might be catching. If you can't find the problem, bring it with you when we meet and I'll look at it.
Q: What do you think of the Karla Starr of the Seattle Weekly's article about video game hardware testing?
I read that when it came out. It's pretty accurate. I've been to VMC a few times where that testing is done. It's kinda brute force last stage game qual testing, after a lot of other testing has been done at the developer and MS. Funny, but you can only automate so much. And then you need to have people touch it and use it to find the unlikely bugs.
Q: How much more reliable are the current generation of Xbox 360 than the previous designs? Original Xenon, Zypher and Falcon.
I've heard that the failure rates for the current design is sub 10%. Much much better, but still too high imoh. And those designs haven't seen much life yet, so no one knows if that failure rate will hold.
Q: Do you think that the "Falcon" Xbox 360 design is the final Xbox 360 hardware iteration or will they come out with a redesigned Xbox 360?
They will come out with new hardware at least once a year until they retire this design. That's the console financial model. Keep the features and functionality the same, reduce cost and price, and improve quality if needed. The 360 roadmap always called for SI die shrink and integration, since that's where most of the cost is. Right now they are working to get the GPU and CPU on the same BGA package for the next mobo. Could lower cost, heat, number of heat sinks, mother board size (maybe squeeze the PS inside too), etc. Too bad that they screwed up and forgot to retain the JTAG IEEE 1149 test functionality, at least what little they had. Now it will be almost impossible for them to tell if that chip is bad if the unit won't boot in the factory. So they will have to trouble shoot by replacing the most expensive part in the system blindly. They keep repeating bad decisions, and everyone is afraid to push issues considered to be bad news.
Q: Do you think that third party fans like the Nyko Intercooler will make things worse? Are they snake oil? I personally have plastic Tiki figures around my Xbox to ward off any evil spirits and so far they have done better in protecting than some of the fan coolers that you see at Gamestop.
I don't know, I'd have to test them. But I'll give you some thoughts. In order for those fans to do any good, they would have to increase the volume of air coming through the box w/o adding heat. I think those things are powered through the USB hub, which is specced at 5 volts, 1/2 an amp. So very little heat added. But the piggybacked fan would have to run at a higher volume that the box fan in order to unload it and make it spin faster, pulling more air over the heatsinks. Would be an easy test to run. Just tape a dry cleaning bag to the back with and w/o the extra fan and time how long to fill. Or if you have access to one, an anemometer is a test instrument that measures airflow and would give a more accurate reading.
Note : the Nyko Intercoolers draws power from the 360 power-source and it looks like surefire way to potentially make things worse.
Q: How many times does an Xbox 360 unit have to be sent in and repaired before they will replace it with a completely new unit?
That's not how it works. You send in a broken box, you get back a working box (hopefully). So there is a rotating stock of the original units that get repaired and returned to service. Plus, they keep finding these cashes of launch units here and there and using them too. Didn't you hear during the holidays that bundles were found with units made in 06? Those were pulled back from the retail channel last spring when the new heatsink was done, and had the new heatsink placed on them and then put into the shipping flow like any other box.
Back to the rotating inventory of launch units. You risk getting one of those back until the last one is out of the system. I imagine the next big outrage will be when some of the folks who waited till Falcon to buy a console for reliability reasons, and has to send it in for service, gets a Xenon back! Even when all of the Xenons are gone, you will likely get a newer gen repaired one back rather than new. Unless the fail rate gets so low there are none available. I'm holding my breath...
Q: How could the wireless racing wheel have overheating problems with the AC adapter? I can't think of any external video game accessory that had similar problems.
I don't know. I heard that one was an over reaction, and no test could have found it. That happens sometimes. A supplier changes something, or it happens so rarely that it can't be seen in any reasonable or even possible sample size. Like Xbox 1's catching on fire. That happened 25 times out of 25 million units. How can you test for that unless you know exactly what causes it? If you know, you design it out.
Q: The original Xbox had a recall of some of the power supply cords. Did that affect the design of the 360?
Safety became a paramount concern. We realized that we could meet all regulations and still have problems. So extra effort was made to have zero safety defects. See the comment about 25 fires from this, above.
Q: There has seemed to be an executive exodus from the top of the Xbox project. Seamus Blackley, Peter Moore, James Allard. Do you think that there something that has been causing the "fathers of Xbox" to want to move on?
Seamus left a long time ago, and I think there was some conflict so that it wasn't entirely voluntary. J Allard left to go do Zune (along with Greg Gibson), and is a big part of the team who owns the strategic vision of MS E&D under Robbie Bach. Peter was a surprise. He sure left in a hurry, and not the way top people usually go, which is usually with a longer notice. And right after the warranty extension announcement. I don't know if they are related, but it looks like they could be in some way. I noticed you didn't mention Ed Fries, who left in 04. I heard he landed at Sony, but can't verify. But I don't see the senior team wanting to move or moving. Very few people who leave do so voluntarily. Note: I did forget to mention Ed Fries.
Q: Do you see much of a long term future for Microsoft?s Entertainment & Devices Division? I saw that they just got a new campus and troubled projects rarely get new expensive buildings. Do you see that division ever turning a profit? So what do you think their overall hardware strategy is? Do you think that they will still be selling videogame systems and music players in five years?
Xbox's mission statement is to preserve the Windows monopoly and extend it into the living room, as a media extender for a Media Center PC, along with a host of other MS and other company's hardware devices that fit into a digital entertainment lifestyle. MS has the bucks to keep losing money on Xbox for a long time, maybe forever. They've already lost around 6 billion dollars. How are they ever going to make that back on Xbox? They can't. Maybe they don't think they have to. That amount might be just 1 or 2 quarters of profit for an integrated hw/sw portfolio, with windows, PC Hardware, Xbox, Zune, TV, Movies, ads, etc., all providing some revenue stream to MS. You should check out their jobs site sometime. You can learn a lot about what they are doing. And their patent applications. They have a team working on making PCs now. That voice activated thing they did for Ford? Where do you think you will see that next? MS devices and sw is my guess.
That new H&E campus says that MS is getting into consumer electronics in a big way, and you can bet they are working to refine a strategy of integrating their offerings into a digital lifestyle universe, with most everything covered that we could want to stay productive, connected and entertained. Not piece meal, like some companies seem to be approaching electronics. Look at Apple. They are doing great, keep rolling out innovative stuff, but what's their vision and strategy to implement? What's their roadmap and timeline? How does it all go together, work together? I can't tell from what they say or do. But I can see what MS is trying to do. They are just getting started I think. So yes, they will still be doing this in 5 years. But they really need to mature their business and change some blood in there. Hire some key people who have experience running large hardware companies who can put the right organization, process and infrastructure in place. If they don't, they may continue to have quality and operational issues that will really dampen their progress. And with all of the external challenges in consumer markets, even MS can't afford to be it's own enemy for too much longer.
Q: Do you think that there is going to be a third generation Xbox?
I understand they are working on it right now. But don't look for it any time soon. It's years away. News flash: Sony and Nintendo are working on their next boxes in some way too.
Q: So do you play games?
Just a little. I lack the hardware abstraction layer in my brain that allows me to translate body motion into controller commands. If I am playing a racing game and I want to turn right I tend to turn the controller to the right. Just like the Wii. Funny thing. In the middle of '03 I tried to convince our director of "innovation" that we needed to do motion control, simple and intuitive controllers, and focus on family oriented and just plain fun content. Well before the Wii came out. He completely disregarded it. Oh well. I bet they wish they had that decision back as a do over.
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/19/08 1:54 p.m.
I didn't changed my interviews typed response to my questions.
They were on the team that actually built the 360 and they confirmed things about this story. Before there were rumors and theories on the internet but this is actually coming from someone who knows every circuit and solder on the 360.
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/19/08 2:32 p.m.
Well "Posted by unregistered user at 1/19/08 2:27 p.m. "my source has years of electronics experience and actually worked on the Xbox 360 but I am sure I'll pass on your amateur anonymous flaming scientific critique.
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/19/08 2:51 p.m.
The interview was not through official Microsoft channels.
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/19/08 3:16 p.m.
Steve I was at PAX 07. you might have seen me there.
For the record I love the Xbox 360. I just wish that we didn't have to worry about the RROD all the time.
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/19/08 3:20 p.m.
This article is already on Engadget and Digg
New Xbox 360 Failure Rates Still Around 10 Percent?
http://gizmodo.com/346891/new-xbox-360-failure-rates-still-around-10-percent
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/19/08 3:40 p.m.
I am not apologizing for anything. This is second time that I've had a some major insider information to post.
Also if anyone has any additional questions for my source feel free to post them.
Posted by AvalancheChief at 1/19/08 4:00 p.m.
Employee number and building number - legal and corporate affairs along with consumer ar/pr would like to know.
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/19/08 4:21 p.m.
Well "Posted by unregistered user at 1/19/08 3:53 p.m."
Last week I was thought of as an rabid anti-Sony fanboy who hated Blu-Ray. Every platform has fanboys and the truth can be a bit painful. Despite all the RROD issues I have still never been tempted to get a PS3 due to the lack of decent exclusive games.
Posted by AvalancheChief at 1/19/08 7:03 p.m.
From the interview:
Q: So what do you think the real failure rate of the Xbox 360 is? Some have estimated it as high as 30%. I got my Xbox in early 2007 and so far so good but what do you think the chance is that it's going to die on me one day.
It's around 30%, and all will probably fail early. This quarter they are expecting 1 M failures, most of those Xenons. Some of those are repeat failures. Life expectancy is all over the map because the design has very little margin for most of the important parameters. That means it's not a fault tolerant design. So a good unit may last a couple of years, while a bad unit can fail in hours. I have a launch unit and have not had a single problem with it. And it's used a lot. But I don't know anyone else with a 360 that hasn't broken, except you now. There's no way to tell when yours might die. But the cooler you can keep it, the longer it will probably last. So stand it up, keep it in free air, etc. :Note : Xenon was the code name for the first Xbox 360 mother board.
OK. Now follow the math here. Failure rate is 30%.
Microsoft estimates by the interviewees information, not some corporate press release, one million XBox's will need repairs for this issue. The interviewee also states that some of these repairs are repeat repairs.
According to Microsoft sales sources, and confirmed by NPD, Microsoft states that 17.7 million XBox 360 consoles have been sold since launch.
http://www.blasteroids.com/news/news_item.cfm/12527
OK, now lets do some sixth grade math.
17.7 million units - according to the secret interview about 30% are in repair = 5,310,000 units in repair.
Ahhhh, but the interviewee goes on to states that they estimate one million consoles will be repaired (I'm going to ASS-U-ME this calendar year. So
4.0 million / 17.7 million = 22%
I'm using the numbers the secret interviewee provided, and NPD confirmed numbers for the base of XBox 360 consoles that have been sold at the time the article was written +/- 20 days).
So either the one million estimated that will need repairs in 2008 is wrong, or the 30% is wrong. The truth probably lies between.
I feel a 22% +/- failure rate remains unbelievably unacceptably heads should roll high - but his/her/their numbers - well anyone with a brain can see they don't add up, and 8% is well outside of any margin of error, so I'm sure not making apologies for the issue - but the secret source needs to check their numbers, they're off by about a 25% factor.
AC - waterboarding numbers into confession since 1972
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/19/08 8:34 p.m.
I don't understand the critics who are upset that the deep dark secret of the Xbox 360 is an overheating motherboard design that was rushed out the door in order to be ready in time for the November/ Christmas buying season. The problem is not with the CPU or GPU but some major problems with the design of the unit. I am sorry it's not space aliens and Elvis on the grassy knoll.
While I am at it the first couple generations of PS2s had defects galore. My pal BBQ has a PS2 that he has to sometimes hold upside down to get the drive to spin. The first PSP that I had some dead pixels right in the middle of the screen.
I am not going to go into my source's reasons for talking to me about this nor say anything more than they were deep inside Microsoft and very very close to Xbox.
RE AvalancheChief, The source said that one million Xbox units were going to fail and be replaces this quarter not this year. It would be fascinating if Microsoft presented all of the numbers about 360 failures. Also they sold a lot of Xenons and Zephers before they started shipping the Falcon and even then not all Xenons and Zephers had the same components.
Also I have a real job. This is what I do instead of watching TV.
Posted by AvalancheChief at 1/19/08 9:08 p.m.
8bitjoystick wrote:
RE AvalancheChief, The source said that one million Xbox units were going to fail and be replaces this quarter not this year. It would be fascinating if Microsoft presented all of the numbers about 360 failures. Also they sold a lot of Xenons and Zephers before they started shipping the Falcon and even then not all Xenons and Zephers had the same components.
You know - that's great. But your reply shows a bit of your true colors, for someone who is reporting a story you have made a rather emotional response. Lets go back to my post...
OK, now lets do some sixth grade math.
17.7 million units - according to the secret interview about 30% are in repair = 5,310,000 units in repair.
Ahhhh, but the interviewee goes on to states that they estimate one million consoles will be repaired (I'm going to ASS-U-ME this calendar year. So
4.0 million / 17.7 million = 22%
I'm using the numbers the secret interviewee provided, and NPD confirmed numbers for the base of XBox 360 consoles that have been sold at the time the article was written +/- 20 days).
Sorry that you seem to have an axe to grind with Microsoft, but if I had used 1 million for the year as you CLAIMED I did, the percentage would have been 5.6%, not 22%. If you weren't so emotional in this issue and feeling so defensive that the credibility of your source was being questioned, you would realized in my post that I extrapolated out an ANNUALIZED number to reach my 22% figure. So your sources math remains off, and you've responded wrongly to me. Care to apologize?
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/19/08 9:33 p.m.
AvalancheChief we can't know the real failure rate since Microsoft is not officially talking about the real statistics about the amount various Xbox 360 models sold and their particular failure rates. There are hundreds of possible factors for each failure and it's not as simple as arguing about fuzzy math since we don't have all the data. If you want the real numbers go ask Robbie Bach or Steve Balmer.
My source said 30% for the first generation of Xenon's and around 10% for the Falcons. I trust my source. Period.
Posted by AvalancheChief at 1/19/08 9:48 p.m.
AvalancheChief we can't know the real failure rate since Microsoft is not officially talking about the real statistics about the amount various Xbox 360 models sold and their particular failure rates. There are hundreds of possible factors for each failure and it's not as simple as arguing about fuzzy math since we don't have all the data. If you want the real numbers go ask Robbie Bach or Steve Balmer.
My source said 30% for the first generation of Xenon's and around 10% for the Falcons. I trust my source. Period.
Accused me of using the quarter for the year, proved to you I didn't and then you call it, "fuzzy math."
Congrats to you and your political reply - smear my reply, don't admit you weren't wrong in your reply, and then say there is no real answer except for your own.
Impressive...truly...impressive, because your "source" never stated in the section I quoted that 30% was for the first generation XBox, and that was not how you framed your question either. Anyone can scroll up on this page and see that - now you're changing the story for them, or are you your own source?
You got caught not running some simple math checks and asking for clarification from your source for their information and refuse to admit you were wrong when presented. Poor form Seattle-PI, very poor form. Somewhere right now, Bill O'Reilly is smiling at his digital protege.
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/19/08 10:18 p.m.
Dude. You guessed the wrong end of the political spectrum.
The first generation xbox was the big black one and was a very different beast than the Xbox 360.
My source was talking about the first design of the Xbox 360 aka the Xenon. Microsoft has been changing the internal design of the Xbox 360 with component changes, heat sync changes and they are on their third major version of the Xbox 360 motherboard. Each version has a different potential failure rates but there are plenty of external factors and even the same xbox 360 made on the same day from the same factory will have different potential life spans. I personally can't think of a better source of information about. I bet that they know more about the internal workings of the Xbox 360 than Steve Balmer and Bill Gates.
Posted by AvalancheChief at 1/19/08 10:53 p.m.
8bitjoystick wrote:
My source was talking about the first design of the Xbox 360 aka the Xenon. Microsoft has been changing the internal design of the Xbox 360 with component changes, heat sync changes and they are on their third major version of the Xbox 360 motherboard. Each version has a different potential failure rates but there are plenty of external factors and even the same xbox 360 made on the same day from the same factory will have different potential life spans. I personally can't think of a better source of information about. I bet that they know more about the internal workings of the Xbox 360 than Steve Balmer and Bill Gates.
I never SAID the first XBox iteration in my reply - you are the one spinning my words. From your quoted material in my reply:
My source said 30% for the first generation of Xenon's and around 10% for the Falcons.
And I called out that your source nor you stated that the 30% recall rate was specific to the FIRST GENERATION XBox - AKA Xenon as we are discussing here, or thought we were discussing. Your source in what you posted never stated 30% Xenon and 10% Falcon - you did - so now you are interperting the data or not providing us everything that was provided to you by your source.
Wrong side of the poltical asile OK, Michael Moore aka from Roger & Me (not Sicko as his facts were rock solid for 98% of that documentary) would be very proud of your spin.
But now its just fuzzy math - 1 million returns/repairs a quarter, 17.7 million sold, 30% recall rate overall, which was what your source said, not generationally specific, does not add up when you run the math. Period. I trust mathematics and my own eyes based on the information your source gave you, not the spin that is now going on because the presented numbers don't add up.
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/19/08 11:52 p.m.
Tell you what AvalancheChief my gamertag is Jake8bitjoystik if you want to play some Halo 3 send me an Xbox Live message.
The Sony fanboys think I am pro Microsoft and anti Sony. The Microsoft fanboys think I am pro Sony and Anti microsoft. If they only knew that I was pro Generation NEX and Anti-3DO.
My next post will be a personal history of dead videogame systems starting with my old Colecovision.
I can't believe that the biggest bombshell of my article that no-one is going off about is that there is going to be a third generation Xbox and that Microsoft is not going the leave the Xbox business. There are two things I want from an "Xbox 720" the ability to play all my 360 games without emulation and a failure rate of 1%. If they do that I'll start camping in line outside in Redmond tomorrow.
Posted by 8bitjoystick at 1/20/08 1:50 a.m.
I do believe that interacting with comment writers is a part of being a good blogger.
Posted by AvalancheChief at 1/20/08 7:38 a.m.
8bitjoystick
Tell you what AvalancheChief my gamertag is Jake8bitjoystik if you want to play some Halo 3 send me an Xbox Live message.
The Sony fanboys think I am pro Microsoft and anti Sony. The Microsoft fanboys think I am pro Sony and Anti microsoft. If they only knew that I was pro Generation NEX and Anti-3DO.
My next post will be a personal history of dead videogame systems starting with my old Colecovision.
I can't believe that the biggest bombshell of my article that no-one is going off about is that there is going to be a third generation Xbox and that Microsoft is not going the leave the Xbox business. There are two things I want from an "Xbox 720" the ability to play all my 360 games without emulation and a failure rate of 1%. If they do that I'll start camping in line outside in Redmond tomorrow.
Now here we go - now it gets real funny. Not interested at all because:
1) I don't own an XBox 360
2) I have no desire to play Halo 3
3) I have no desire to own an XBox 360
4) I have a PS2 and a PSP
So I own two Sony gaming consoles - eyeballing the PS3 (wanted the Blu-Ray vs. HD dust to settle) and suddenly I'm a Microsoft fanboy? Hell I'm not even remotely close to Puget Sound but your so stuck fast in your position you can't even see what I'm asking for.
The math was wrong, I did some math, you posted that I based that on quarter not year - I showed you now I based it on year and asked for you to say, "gee, I was wrong on that one, SORRY," and you can't bring yourself to do it.
Good journalism, as someone who was a journalist for four years, and as someone who has done public relations, and not for Microsoft, is when you're called out you go, "geee, I was wrong about that, I'm sorry and let me check with my source."
Sorry that is too hard for you to do.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)
| July 2008 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Recent entries
· Review : Dragon Ball Z : Burst Limit for Xbox 360
· Rock Band 2 to Rock Xbox 360 first this September! Dear God! There will be Rock!
· Xbox 360 Price Cut Possibly Soon : 20-Gig Xbox 360 $299
· Xbox 360 DRM License Transfer Tool is Finally Out!
· Time Restriction on DRM Movie Rentals Still Sort of Suck
· Call of Duty : World at War looks like a lot more than just a WW2 game
· Review : Guitar Hero : On Tour for the Nintendo DS
· Kids Totally Love Nintendo DS
RSS/Web feeds (help)
Game Blogs
· Gamerscore Blog
· PlayStation.Blog
· GameSetWatch
· GamesAreFun.com
· Kotaku
· GayGamer.net
· Game| Life
· 8bitJoystick.com
· Joystiq
· Infendo.com
· GoNintendo.com
· Xbox 360 Fanboy
· DS Fanboy
· PSP Fanboy
· PS3 Fanboy
· Nintendo Wii Fanboy
· VintageComputing.com
· 4 Color Rebellion
· Angry Video Game Nerd
· GameTrailers.com
· Xbox Live's Major Nelson
· Digg Game News
· Games For Lunch
· Game Politics.com
Tech
· The Chris Pirillo Show
· Gizmodo
· Engadget
· TUAW (Apple)
· Digital World Tokyo
· Digg
Seattle
· Pink Godzilla Games
· Seattlest
· Slog
· Metroblogging Seattle
Nerd
· Make Magazine
· Craft Magazine
· Wired
· LifeHacker
· TreeHugger
· WikiHow
· Channel 10
· Cinematical
· BoingBoing.net
· Metafilter
· Diggnation
· The Totally Rad Show
· John Kricfalusi
· Geek.com
· Consumerist.com
· Wonkette.com
Comics
· Diesel Sweeties
· Cat and Girl
· The Fart Party
· Toothpaste for Dinner
· Overcompensating
· Penny Arcade
· PvP Online
· VG Cats
· White Ninja
Posted by unregistered user at 1/19/08 12:28 p.m.
The 360 was launched in winter 2005 not fall 2006.