Okay, here is the newest trend regarding our pampered pooches. Pet Marriages. Arranged and expensive events that tie the knot between two dogs of the opposite gender. I guess, at times after the fact to prevent that the pups are born illegitimate.

My first thought when I read the article was that this is just a tad over the top. I mean, I cook for my dogs, I don't kennel them, and yes, they get a birthday cake and Christmas stocking. I cremated by dear old Newf after he passed away, and thought the outdoor blessing of the animals we stumbled upon by chance last year was sweet - even though we didn't stay because Davie and Will had much more fun swimming in the ocean and exploring that beached, dead seal, than listening to the priest.

I am all for sending our beloved animals positive vibes, including them into our activities, and treating them with kindness and consideration. But is it really necessary to make them participate in rituals and traditions we choose for ourselves? Dogs don't care about a marriage. Dogs aren't even that monogamous. I am sure that my Will's birthmother invited more than just one male in when she was in heat.

I'm sure the newlyweds enjoy the wedding cake, but couldn't the money for the ceremony, outfits and marriage license be better invested by supporting a cash strapped rescue organization?

I guess some humane societies organize such events as fundraisers. That is so a reflection of our human society. The haves in our society attend fashion shows and concerts, 500 dollar per plate dinners combined with silent auctions, to feed the poor and shelter the homeless. Folks with money can't just donate and feel good. No, they have to roll in in their limousines, all black-tied and done up. And their privileged canines get married, also all dressed up, and chomp on a 200 dollar wedding cake, to benefit the forgotten dog in a wire run for one more day.