Advertising
seattlepi.com
Subscribe | Contact Us | Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Jump to:  Weather | Traffic | Webtowns | Mariners | Seahawks | Sonics | Calendar
BLOGS ?

OUR AFFILIATES
NWsource
KOMO
MSNBC
digitalcity
Buzzworthy
Brian Chin's Weblog surveys the Web to spot what people are talking about ...

December 23, 2003

Who'll fight the RIAA?

Last Friday's appeals court ruling barring the music industry from forcing ISPs to disclose subscribers' identities via subpoena may be small consolation to people who've already been fingered and sued for trading copyrighted songs.

Legal experts canvassed by Wired News say that while the defendants in those suits could hypothetically argue that they were identified unjustly, there's no accepted legal theory for doing so. More importantly, it's unlikely anyone has the resources to mount a prolonged legal challenge.

Category: Zeitgeist watch
Posted by Brian Chin at December 23, 2003 04:10 AM
Comments

I don't understand why one needs to "fight" the labels for stealing from them. That's like asking to go fight Safeway for you shoplifting a loaf of bread. Sure, it didn't cost Safeway *much*, but is Safeway really out of line for asking that you're prosecuted for theft?

I don't think so.

Posted by: Dustin at December 23, 2003 01:31 PM

Well, it's a little bit like stealing from the thief, Dustin. The RIAA and its cohorts, the major labels, have stolen marketshare from the people, the indies, and musicians for years and years and years. Payola scandals, blatant and irrepressible monopolistic behavior, violent protection of their distribution channels, connections to organized crime...

The RIAA, the major labels, and to some extent BMI and ASCAP are not now the good guys, have never been the good guys, and will never be the good guys.

Those of us who do want to put our music out for free (really for our own marketing purposes, but hey, little guy's gotta start somewhere) are in the path of the big steamroller that is the RIAA. Whether the RIAA does it by screwing with the technology or by sueing bands and indies who own their material and who are giving it away, we will all be crushed in the end if the RIAA isn't stopped.

Because of the RIAA, the level of originality and quality in American pop music rises to Britney Spears and not much higher. It's sad that verite is not valued in the USofA.

Posted by: Robert Sanville at December 24, 2003 09:39 PM

I disagree. Let's say your band was called "XXX Disco". Tell me why I'd go to Kazaa and look for "XXX Disco"? I never would in a million years because I would have never heard of your band before.

Most people use P2P software to get the material that is popular and isn't supposed to be free. Without promotion, no one is going to know your band, and therefore isn't going to look it up on a P2P network.

There are tons of ways for your band to have free distribution. Kazaa and the rest aren't ways that want to do that for you, they want to (and are) profit(ing) off theft of copyrighted materials.

Posted by: Dustin at December 27, 2003 06:03 PM

have any of you ever recorded movies off the tv or songs off the radio.
basically the same thing thats why the riaa didnt want vcr's. but did that hurt they industry? NO!

Posted by: tim at December 31, 2003 10:16 AM

uhh, are you an idiot? The RIAA had nothing to do with the lobby against VCR's.

Besides, there's a distinct difference between getting a crappy analog copy of a show onto your VCR or cassette, and getting what could be a (theoretically) perfect digital copy of said same item that will never degrade. Why buy the DVD of a show that's available for free over the TV air?

Same theory there.

Posted by: Dustin at January 5, 2004 02:07 PM

Who made you the expert on all this? The RIAA is not fighting over the QUALITY of the recording or material. They are fighting the CONTENT that is pirated. And yes, websites such as peer-to-peer sites may be abused in music piracy, but that should not mean they are illegal or cannot be used as a means to promote independent artists. Uhhh, have you ever heard of the "grapevine?" Too many assumptions in your arguments....

Posted by: AntiRetribution at January 7, 2004 02:54 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?







  ARCHIVES
November 2005
S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Recent Entries
· Words fail me
· Self-choking can kill you
· Downloading Danger
· Public editing that works
· Self-taxation
· Don't dump that PC
· Brand humanity
· Seeking permission
· What's in a nickname?
· Messy traffic

Categories
· March of progress
· Mediasweep
· News in review
· Site insights
· When you have a minute
· You can't make this stuff up
· Zeitgeist watch

Monthly archive
· May 2005
· April 2005
· March 2005
· February 2005
· January 2005
· December 2004
· November 2004
· October 2004
· September 2004
· August 2004
· July 2004
· June 2004
· May 2004
· April 2004
· March 2004
· February 2004
· January 2004
· December 2003
· November 2003
· October 2003
· September 2003
· August 2003
· July 2003
· June 2003
· May 2003
· April 2003
· March 2003
· February 2003

What is this?

 
Home | Site Map | About the P-I | Contact Us | P-I Jobs | Home Delivery
 
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000

Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820

Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
©1996-2005 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Service/Privacy Policy