![]() |
« The Devil You Know | Main | No Public. No Press. No Family. No Friends. »
goes to Jerome du Bois, who thinks Duchamp and everything that flows from him stinks.
With the intensity of a fundamentalist preacher confronting a local fornicator, he fulminates on his blog, The Tears of Things, incinerating not his targets but himself.
Rage is his fatal flaw. As James Baldwin wrote in "Stanger in the Village" from 1953, "Rage can only with difficulty, and never entirely, be brought under the domination of the intelligence and is therefore not susceptible to any arguments whatever. "
The target of Du Bois' latest attack is Josh Greene, who 10 years ago talked Greg Kucera into exhibiting the signs he bought from people begging in the street, an exhibition titled "Will Work For Food."
Shortly after the show closed, Greene left Seattle for San Francisco. He's currently exhibiting in Arizona, where du Bois peddles his right-wing tirades. (He hates Jon Haddock, obviously.)
I'd like to thank du Bois for the Greene update, especially for linking to Kathleen Vanesian's profile of the artist.
It's a terrific piece about Greene and the larger issue of relational aesthetics. Her take wipes out mine, here.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)

| May 2008 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Recent entries
· Till the Body Cools
· Frank O'Hara in the Heaven on Earth Bldg
· Peripheral Vision
· Find a Blogger
· AIDS and Art
· Barack Obama on Arts Education
· The Open Space of the West
· The Wearwithal To Wear Whatever Contest
RSS/Web feeds (help)





101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by unregistered user at 4/29/08 11:20 a.m.
Why "Ralph Nader"? Did you mean Rush Limbaugh? Ralph always struck me as a force for good. A bit too earnest and humorless, perhaps, but definitely one of the good guys. Am I missing the joke?