![]() |
« Oscar Tuazon Wins Betty Bowen Award | Main | I Heart Dangerous Chunky »
As F. Lennox Campello notes in his lively blog, Mid Atlantic Art News, he got there before me in rebuking the Washington Post for its race-based story on Jacob Lawrence in the White House.
Here's his original post. Here's mine.
Granted. He's first. Now that I've read his stories, however, two things pop up. First is his assessment of Jacob Lawrence's character. Evaluating the personality of artists isn't a critic's job. Just by logging in on that subject, Campello is already over the top. But because I find his version of Lawrence so deeply off base, I'm going to bat the ball back in a court neither of us should be playing on in the first place.
Lawrence was a generous, gentle person. Thomas Merton wrote once that people full of grace accept praise the way a pane of glass accepts the sun. Praise passes through them without changing their character. I've seen Lawrence both fawned over and patronized, and he never retreated from the humane, enagaged and thoughtful contact he offered everyone.
Here's Campello's take: "In my own personal experience, Jacob Lawrence was pretty close to an a--hole as an arts teacher (which sometimes means that he was also a brilliant teacher to students other than me), a pretty good drinking buddy, and an opinionated b--tard. But Lawrence and his artwork was also without a doubt (in my opinion) one of the greatest American contributions (and artists) of the 20th century."
You're entitled, Campello, but I doubt there's a person in Seattle who'd agree with you on your personal comments. Not a single one.
Onward to eyebrows. He found my comments about Laura Bush's eyebrow pencil "rather weird." It would be weird if she were an artist or any kind of private citizen. But she's First Lady. When she muffs the makeup for a photo shoot, it's worth a deconstructing comment or two.
What would be petty if I had written it about my mother is fair for the First. She's surrounded by helpers and heading for the Washington's Post's camera. Is it a cry for help? A public sign of private anguish? Decoding Laura Bush's eyebrow would have been child's play for Roland Barthes, but since he's no longer with us, I simply raised the question.
On the other hand, I see Campello's point. I'm not Barthes nor Tim Gunn. In the future I pledge to leave everybody's eyebrows alone.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)

| July 2008 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Recent entries
· Life echoes the Earth Room
· Welcome to instant journalism
· Artists and YouTube
· I'll have what he's having
· When two ax arcs are not the same
· Just say no. It's easier.
· Dust Thou Art
· Still crazy after all these years
RSS/Web feeds (help)







101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by unregistered user at 9/27/07 8:07 a.m.
Hi Regina,
Tks for your comments, and yes, perhaps I was over the top on that paragraph, especially as it reads by itself; it certainly wasn't meant to deliver a condemnation of Lawrence's character.
The comments about Lawrence as a teacher (especially coming from me) would apply to generally and be how I would describe any of my art professors at the time and still translating to 2007 - from the eyes of a juvenile art student - not just Lawrence but prob. could apply also to Alden Mason, Calentano, DuPen (who was very gentle) and others from that lively period at the UW.
Perhaps I should have used the adjective "difficult" (in fact I will correct my post to say just that). I did say that he was also a "brilliant teacher" to others, as a way - I thought - of showing that I was relating my own biased experience and perspective.
A good drinking buddy - that's a good thing - I think.
An opinionated b*****d - That was meant as a compliment - I certainly consider myself an opinionated b*****d, and Lawrence's opinions, especially when translated to canvas or paper, were what made his work earn him the title of a great artist.
And you are correct: he was also a very generous person; especially with his time and opinions, and even his artwork (which as I recall used to drive his art dealer crazy).
I hope that clarifies the wording and finds me a few more agreeing Seattle voices.
Warmest regards,
Lenny
PS - The eyebrow stuff is still weird! :-)